Attended and Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Have Better Agreement With Ambulatory Monitoring Than Conventional Office Readings

被引:28
作者
Andreadis, Emmanuel A. [1 ,2 ]
Geladari, Charalampia V. [1 ,2 ]
Angelopoulos, Epameinondas T. [1 ]
Savva, Florentia S. [1 ,2 ]
Georgantoni, Anna I. [1 ,2 ]
Papademetriou, Vasilios [3 ]
机构
[1] Evangelismos Gen Hosp, Hypertens & Cardiovasc Dis Prevent Ctr, Athens, Greece
[2] Evangelismos Gen Hosp, Dept Internal Med 4, Athens, Greece
[3] Vet Affairs & Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Washington, DC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
automated office blood pressure; conventional office blood pressure readings; daytime ambulatory blood pressure; HYPERTENSION; RISK; HOME;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.118.008994
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement is superior to conventional office blood pressure (OBP) because it eliminates the "white coat effect" and shows a strong association with ambulatory blood pressure. Methods and Results-We conducted a cross-sectional study in 146 participants with office hypertension, and we compared AOBP readings, taken with or without the presence of study personnel, before and after the conventional office readings to determine whether their variation in blood pressure showed a difference in blood pressure values. We also compared AOBP measurements with daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and conventional office readings. The mean age of the studied population was 56 +/- 12 years, and 53.4% of participants were male. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias (ie, mean of the differences) of 0.6 +/- 6 mm Hg systolic for attended AOBP compared with unattended and 1.4 +/- 6 and 0.1 +/- 6 mm Hg bias for attended compared with unattended systolic AOBP when measurements were performed before and after conventional readings, respectively. A small bias was observed when unattended and attended systolic AOBP measurements were compared with daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (1.3 +/- 13 and 0.6 +/- 13 mm Hg, respectively). Biases were higher for conventional OBP readings compared with unattended AOBP (-5.6 +/- 15 mm Hg for unattended AOBP and oscillometric OBP measured by a physician, 6.8 +/- 14 mm Hg for unattended AOBP and oscillometric OBP measured by a nurse, and -2.1 +/- 12 mm Hg for unattended AOBP and auscultatory OBP measured by a second physician). Conclusions-Our findings showed that independent of the presence or absence of medical staff, AOBP readings revealed similar values that were closer to daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring than conventional office readings, further supporting the use of AOBP in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Home, automated office, and conventional office blood pressure as predictors of cardiovascular risk
    Andreadis, Emmanuel A.
    Papademetriou, Vasilios
    Geladari, Charalampia V.
    Kolyvas, George N.
    Angelopoulos, Epameinondas T.
    Aronis, Konstantinos N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 11 (03) : 165 - 170
  • [2] Automated Office Blood Pressure is Associated with Urine Albumin Excretion in Hypertensive Subjects
    Andreadis, Emmanuel A.
    Agaliotis, Gerasimos D.
    Angelopoulos, Epameinondas T.
    Tsakanikas, Athanasios P.
    Kolyvas, George N.
    Mousoulis, George P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 25 (09) : 969 - 973
  • [3] Automated office versus home measurement of blood pressure in the assessment of morning hypertension
    Andreadis, Emmanuel A.
    Angelopoulos, Epameinondas T.
    Tsakanikas, Athanasios P.
    Agaliotis, Gerasimos D.
    Kravvariti, Sofia D.
    Mousoulis, George P.
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2012, 17 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [4] Automated Office Blood Pressure and 24-h Ambulatory Measurements are Equally Associated With Left Ventricular Mass Index
    Andreadis, Emmanuel A.
    Agaliotis, Gerasimos D.
    Angelopoulos, Epameinondas T.
    Tsakanikas, Athanasios P.
    Chaveles, Loannis A.
    Mousoulis, George P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2011, 24 (06) : 661 - 666
  • [5] Automated office blood pressure - being alone and not location is what matters most
    Armstrong, David
    Matangi, Murray
    Brouillard, Daniel
    Myers, Martin G.
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2015, 20 (04) : 204 - 208
  • [6] Attended Versus Unattended Blood Pressure Measurement in a Real Life Setting
    Bauer, Frederic
    Seibert, Felix S.
    Rohn, Benjamin
    Bauer, Klaus A. R.
    Rolshoven, Eckart
    Babel, Nina
    Westhoff, Timm H.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2018, 71 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [7] Automated oscillometric blood pressure versus auscultatory blood pressure as a predictor of carotid intima-medial thickness in male firefighters
    Campbell, N. R. C.
    McKay, D. W.
    Conradson, H.
    Lonn, E.
    Title, L. M.
    Anderson, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2007, 21 (07) : 588 - 590
  • [8] Automated compared to manual office blood pressure and to home blood pressure in hypertensive patients
    Filipovsky, Jan
    Seidlerova, Jitka
    Kratochvil, Zdenek
    Karnosova, Petra
    Hronova, Marketa
    Mayer, Otto, Jr.
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE, 2016, 25 (04) : 228 - 234
  • [9] Johnson KC, BLOOD PRESSURE MEASU
  • [10] Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension
    Leung, Alexander A.
    Nerenberg, Kara
    Daskalopoulou, Stella S.
    McBrien, Kerry
    Zarnke, Kelly B.
    Dasgupta, Kaberi
    Cloutier, Lyne
    Gelfer, Mark
    Lamarre-Cliche, Maxime
    Milot, Alain
    Bolli, Peter
    Tremblay, Guy
    McLean, Donna
    Tobe, Sheldon W.
    Ruzicka, Marcel
    Burns, Kevin D.
    Vallee, Michel
    Prasad, G. V. Ramesh
    Lebel, Marcel
    Feldman, Ross D.
    Selby, Peter
    Pipe, Andrew
    Schiffrin, Ernesto L.
    McFarlane, Philip A.
    Oh, Paul
    Hegele, Robert A.
    Khara, Milan
    Wilson, Thomas W.
    Penner, S. Brian
    Burgess, Ellen
    Herman, Robert J.
    Bacon, Simon L.
    Rabkin, Simon W.
    Gilbert, Richard E.
    Campbell, Tavis S.
    Grover, Steven
    Honos, George
    Lindsay, Patrice
    Hill, Michael D.
    Coutts, Shelagh B.
    Gubitz, Gord
    Campbell, Norman R. C.
    Moe, Gordon W.
    Howlett, Jonathan G.
    Boulanger, Jean-Martin
    Prebtani, Ally
    Larochelle, Pierre
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Jones, Charlotte
    Ogilvie, Richard I.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 32 (05) : 569 - 588