Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report

被引:29
|
作者
Lu, Jun [1 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ]
Zheng, Hua-Long [1 ]
Li, Ping [1 ]
Xie, Jian-Wei [1 ]
Wang, Jia-Bin [1 ]
Lin, Jian-Xian [1 ]
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ]
Cao, Long-Long [1 ]
Lin, Mi [1 ]
Tu, Ru-Hong [1 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gastr Surg, Union Hosp, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2017年 / 31卷 / 07期
关键词
Gastric cancer; 3D Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Randomized; controlled trial; 3-DIMENSIONAL LAPAROSCOPY; SURGICAL SKILLS; SINGLE-SURGEON; GASTRECTOMY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-5310-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes following three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Background There is a lack of prospective evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a phase III single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Methods We compared operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissections, morbidity, and mortality between the 3D and 2D groups following laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT02327481. Results A total of 228 patients were randomized (3D group 115 cases; 2D group 113 cases) between January 1, 2015 and September 1, 2015. Seven patients who underwent exploratory operations were excluded. Finally, a total of 221 patients were analyzed (3D group 109 cases, 2D group 112 cases). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the clinical pathological characteristics, operating time (3D vs. 2D, 184 +/- 36 vs. 178 +/- 37 min, P = 0.288), number of lymph node dissections (36 +/- 14 vs. 37 +/- 13, P = 0.698), time to first ambulation (2.27 +/- 1.60 vs. 2.04 +/- 0.84, P = 0.18), flatus (3.89 +/- 1.49 vs. 3.69 +/- 1.12, P = 0.255), liquid diet (4.88 +/- 1.88 vs. 4.79 +/- 1.57, P = 0.684), or duration of postoperative hospital stay (12.52 +/- 4.83 vs. 12.63 +/- 7.32, P = 0.903). The postoperative complication rates of the 3D and 2D groups were 18.3 and 16.1%, respectively, P = 0.723. No patients died during the postoperative hospital stay. However, the intraoperative blood loss in the 3D group was significantly lower than the 2D group (58 +/- 75 vs. 78 +/- 72 ml, P = 0.047). Conclusion There was no significant difference in operation time and number of lymph node harvested between the 3D and 2D groups; however, 3D laparoscopic surgery may reduce the intraoperative blood loss compared to 2D procedure. Therefore, we conclude that this trial is safe and is thus ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:2939 / 2945
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of 3D and 2D laparoscopy: Initial experience of perioperative outcomes and clinical assessment
    Yang, Li
    Bu, Guosen
    Zhao, Jing
    La, Xiaolin
    Ma, Cailing
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 53 (04)
  • [32] A Suggestion on How to Compare 2D and 3D Laparoscopy: A Qualitative Analysis of the Literature and Randomized Pilot Study
    Zundel, Sabine
    Lehnick, Dirk
    Heyne-Pietschmann, Marie
    Truck, Mike
    Szavay, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (01): : 114 - 120
  • [33] Comparing 2D and 3D Solar Radiation Modeling in Urban Areas
    Kolecansky, Stefan
    Hofierka, Jaroslav
    Boglarsky, Jozef
    Supinsky, Jozef
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [34] A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgery
    Harris, David J.
    Vine, Samuel J.
    Wilson, Mark R.
    McGrath, John S.
    LeBel, Marie-Eve
    Buckingham, Gavin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (11): : 4527 - 4532
  • [35] Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing D2 and D4 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer
    B. Zheng
    B. Ma
    K. Yang
    D. Mi
    European Surgery, 2011, 43 : 255 - 261
  • [36] Intraoperative Adverse Events, Technical Performance, and Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer A Pooled Analysis From 2 Randomized Trials
    Liu, Zhi-Yu
    Chen, Qi-Yue
    Zhong, Qing
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Lu, Jun
    Cao, Long-Long
    Lin, Mi
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 278 (02) : 222 - 229
  • [37] A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Three-Dimensional (3D) vs. Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy
    Alaraimi, B.
    El Bakbak, W.
    Sarker, S.
    Makkiyah, S.
    Al-Marzouq, A.
    Goriparthi, R.
    Bouhelal, A.
    Quan, V.
    Patel, B.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (11) : 2746 - 2752
  • [38] Comparison of short-term outcomes between single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial
    Teng, Wenhao
    Liu, Jingfu
    Liu, Wenju
    Jiang, Jianping
    Chen, Meimei
    Wei, Cheng
    Chong, Choon Seng
    Zang, Weidong
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (02) : 358 - 366
  • [39] Comparative Study of the Short-Term Outcomes and Long-Term Outcomes using Total 3D and 2D Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with Delta-Shaped Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer
    Zhang, Zhenxing
    Luan, Zhongda
    Wang, Shan
    Ye, Minfeng
    Ji, Kewei
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Honghai
    Li, Yaoqing
    Tao, Feng
    Tao, Kelong
    Xu, Guangen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 86 (05) : 902 - 908
  • [40] Comparing Participation and Interim Effectiveness of Endoscopy and Biomarker-Based Screening for Gastric Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xiao, Haifan
    Luo, Hao
    Qin, Ang
    Shu, Wenxian
    Liu, Xiangyu
    Xiao, Fengfan
    Liao, Xianzhen
    Shi, Zhaohui
    Zou, Yanhua
    Xu, Kekui
    Cao, Shiyu
    Li, Can
    Hu, Yingyun
    Zhang, Senmao
    Guo, Jia
    Wang, Shiyu
    Yan, Shipeng
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 15 (19): : 6110 - 6121