Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report

被引:27
作者
Lu, Jun [1 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ]
Zheng, Hua-Long [1 ]
Li, Ping [1 ]
Xie, Jian-Wei [1 ]
Wang, Jia-Bin [1 ]
Lin, Jian-Xian [1 ]
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ]
Cao, Long-Long [1 ]
Lin, Mi [1 ]
Tu, Ru-Hong [1 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gastr Surg, Union Hosp, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2017年 / 31卷 / 07期
关键词
Gastric cancer; 3D Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Randomized; controlled trial; 3-DIMENSIONAL LAPAROSCOPY; SURGICAL SKILLS; SINGLE-SURGEON; GASTRECTOMY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-5310-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes following three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Background There is a lack of prospective evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a phase III single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Methods We compared operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissections, morbidity, and mortality between the 3D and 2D groups following laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT02327481. Results A total of 228 patients were randomized (3D group 115 cases; 2D group 113 cases) between January 1, 2015 and September 1, 2015. Seven patients who underwent exploratory operations were excluded. Finally, a total of 221 patients were analyzed (3D group 109 cases, 2D group 112 cases). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the clinical pathological characteristics, operating time (3D vs. 2D, 184 +/- 36 vs. 178 +/- 37 min, P = 0.288), number of lymph node dissections (36 +/- 14 vs. 37 +/- 13, P = 0.698), time to first ambulation (2.27 +/- 1.60 vs. 2.04 +/- 0.84, P = 0.18), flatus (3.89 +/- 1.49 vs. 3.69 +/- 1.12, P = 0.255), liquid diet (4.88 +/- 1.88 vs. 4.79 +/- 1.57, P = 0.684), or duration of postoperative hospital stay (12.52 +/- 4.83 vs. 12.63 +/- 7.32, P = 0.903). The postoperative complication rates of the 3D and 2D groups were 18.3 and 16.1%, respectively, P = 0.723. No patients died during the postoperative hospital stay. However, the intraoperative blood loss in the 3D group was significantly lower than the 2D group (58 +/- 75 vs. 78 +/- 72 ml, P = 0.047). Conclusion There was no significant difference in operation time and number of lymph node harvested between the 3D and 2D groups; however, 3D laparoscopic surgery may reduce the intraoperative blood loss compared to 2D procedure. Therefore, we conclude that this trial is safe and is thus ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:2939 / 2945
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Three-Dimensional (3D) vs. Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy [J].
Alaraimi, B. ;
El Bakbak, W. ;
Sarker, S. ;
Makkiyah, S. ;
Al-Marzouq, A. ;
Goriparthi, R. ;
Bouhelal, A. ;
Quan, V. ;
Patel, B. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (11) :2746-2752
[2]   Perioperative, Pathologic, and Early Continence Outcomes Comparing Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Display Systems for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy-A Retrospective, Single-Surgeon Study [J].
Aykan, Serdar ;
Singhal, Paras ;
Nguyen, Daniel P. ;
Yigit, Akin ;
Tuken, Murat ;
Yakut, Emrah ;
Colakerol, Aykut ;
Sulejman, Suhejb ;
Semercioz, Atilla .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (05) :539-543
[3]   Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions:: implications for training [J].
Blavier, Adelaide ;
Gaudissart, Quentin ;
Cadiere, Guy-Bernard ;
Anne-Sophie, Nyssen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 194 (01) :115-121
[4]   Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Chan, ACW ;
Chung, SCS ;
Yim, APC ;
Lau, JYW ;
Ng, EKW ;
Li, AKC .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (05) :438-440
[5]   Using three-dimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy [J].
Chiu, Chieh Jack ;
Prabhu, Kristel Lobo ;
Tan-Tam, Clara Chia-Hua ;
Panton, Ormond Neely M. ;
Meneghetti, Adam .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 209 (05) :824-827
[6]   Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study [J].
Curro, Giuseppe ;
La Malfa, Giuseppe ;
Caizzone, Antonio ;
Rampulla, Valentina ;
Navarra, Giuseppe .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 (11) :2120-2124
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Hanna, GB ;
Shimi, SM ;
Cuschieri, A .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9098) :248-251
[9]  
Hasson HM, 2007, LAPAROSC TODAY, V6, P4
[10]  
Huang CM., 2015, Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer