Impact of Recent Screening on Predicting the Outcome of Prostate Cancer Biopsy in Men With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Data From the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden

被引:60
|
作者
Vickers, Andrew J. [1 ]
Cronin, Angel M. [1 ]
Aus, Gunnar [2 ]
Pihl, Carl-Gustav [3 ]
Becker, Charlotte [4 ]
Pettersson, Kim [5 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [6 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [2 ]
Lilja, Hans [4 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Malmo, Sweden
[5] Univ Turku, Dept Biotechnol, Turku, Finland
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Labs, New York, NY 10021 USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[9] Lund Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Malmo, Sweden
基金
芬兰科学院; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
prostate cancer; screening; prostate specific antigen; kallikreins; molecular markers; PROTOCOL; MORTALITY; MODELS; TRIAL; LEVEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Risk models to predict prostate cancer on biopsy, whether they include only prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or other markers, are intended for use in all men of screening age. However, the association between PSA and cancer probably depends on a man's recent screening history. METHODS: The authors examined the effect of prior screening on the ability to predict the risk of prostate cancer by using a previously reported, 4-kallikrein panel that included total PSA, free PSA, intact PSA, and human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (hK2). The study cohort comprised 1241 men in Gothenburg, Sweden who underwent biopsy for elevated PSA during their second or later visit for the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The predictive accuracy of the 4-kallikrein panel was calculated. RESULTS: Total PSA was not predictive of prostate cancer. The previously published 4-kallikrein model increased predictive accuracy compared with total PSA and age alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.66 vs 0.51; P < .001) but was poorly calibrated and missed many cancers. A model that was developed with recently screened men provided important improvements in discrimination (AUC, 0.67 vs 0.56; P < .001). Using this model reduced the number of biopsies by 413 per 1000 men with elevated PSA, missed 60 of 216 low-grade cancers (Gleason score <= 6), but missed only 1 of 43 high-grade cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Previous participation in PSA screening dramatically changed the performance of statistical models that were designed to predict biopsy outcome. A 4-kallikrein panel was able to predict prostate cancer in men who had a recent screening history and provided independent confirmation that multiple kallikrein forms contribute important diagnostic information for men with elevated PSA. Cancer 2010;116:2612-20. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2612 / 2620
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Updated results from the European Randomized Study of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening for Prostate Cancer: are Asian countries encouraged to promote PSA screening?
    Sugimoto, Mikio
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 14 (04) : 522 - 524
  • [42] Relationship Between Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen on Cancer Detection and Prostate Cancer Death: Long-term Follow-up from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Godtman, Rebecka A.
    Carlsson, Sigrid.
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Nelen, Vera
    Villers, Arnauld
    Rebillard, Xavier
    Kwiatkowski, Maciej
    Recker, Franz
    Wyler, Stephen
    Zappa, Marco
    Puliti, Donella
    Gorini, Giuseppe
    Paez, Alvaro
    Lujan, Marcos
    Nieboer, Daan
    Schroeder, Fritz H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 84 (05) : 503 - 509
  • [43] Screening for Prostate Cancer With the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test A Review of Current Evidence
    Hayes, Julia H.
    Barry, Michael J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (11): : 1143 - 1149
  • [44] Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: Past and future
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 524 - 532
  • [45] Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Effective for Population Screening of Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Review
    Lee, Yoon Jae
    Park, Ji Eun
    Jeon, Byung Ryul
    Lee, Sang Moo
    Kim, Soo Young
    Lee, You Kyoung
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 33 (04) : 233 - 241
  • [46] The relationship between diabetes, prostate-specific antigen screening tests, and prostate cancer
    Miller, Eric A.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Pierre-Victor, Dudith
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (10) : 907 - 914
  • [47] Four-year prostate-specific antigen progression in the non-cancer population of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Páez, A
    Luján, M
    Raaijmakers, R
    Berenguer, A
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 : 84 - 87
  • [48] No excess mortality after prostate biopsy: results from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    Holmberg, Erik
    Moss, Sue M.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Aus, Gunnar
    Auvinen, Anssi P.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (12) : 1912 - 1917
  • [49] Impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing by Dutch general practitioners
    Van der Meer, Saskia
    Kollen, Boudewijn J.
    Hirdes, Willem H.
    Steffens, Martijn G.
    Hoekstra-Weebers, Josette E. H. M.
    Nijman, Rien M.
    Blanker, Marco H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [50] Managing Localized Prostate Cancer in the Era of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
    Brooks, James D.
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (22) : 3906 - 3909