ASSESSING CROP ROTATION SUSTAINABILITY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS

被引:0
作者
Nisperos, Saturnina Fabian [1 ]
McKenzie, Frederic D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Modeling Simulat & Visualizat Engn, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
来源
32ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (ECMS 2018) | 2018年
关键词
Crop rotation; sustainability assessment model; multi-criteria decision analysis; AHP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With the food security challenge faced by nations globally, agriculture sustainability has been a significant consideration for concerned agencies. Sustainability assessments are significant tools in providing support to stakeholders in their crop production planning. Agricultural sustainability assessment, however, is complex and it involves numerous criteria that can be conflicting. In this study we investigated the use Analytical Hierarchy Process, a multi-criteria decision analysis method, in assessing the sustainability of crop rotation alternatives and its applicability to address the multiple criteria of sustainability and the diverse preferences of stakeholders. The comparable results of the model with a sustainability assessment of cropping systems reported in the literature, validates AHP as an apt method for sustainability assessment of crop rotation alternatives and handling the complex criteria of sustainability and preferences of stakeholders. The model results, when well presented, can be utilized to support stakeholders in their decision making and in evaluating their crop rotation choices.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 340
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Influence of conservation tillage and crop rotation on the resilience of an intensive long-term potato cropping system: Restoration of soil biological properties after the potato phase [J].
Carter, M. R. ;
Noronha, C. ;
Peters, R. D. ;
Kimpinski, J. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 133 (1-2) :32-39
[2]   Integrated sustainability assessment of cropping systems with agro-ecological and economic indicators in northern Italy [J].
Castoldi, Nicola ;
Bechini, Luca .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2010, 32 (01) :59-72
[3]   Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment [J].
Cinelli, Marco ;
Coles, Stuart R. ;
Kirwan, Kerry .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 :138-148
[4]   The Choice of the Sustainability Assessment Tool Matters: Differences in Thematic Scope and Assessment Results [J].
de Olde, Evelien M. ;
Bokkers, Eddie A. M. ;
de Boer, Imke J. M. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 136 :77-85
[5]   Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review [J].
Diaz-Balteiro, L. ;
Gonzalez-Pachon, J. ;
Romero, C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 258 (02) :607-616
[6]   Models to support cropping plan and crop rotation decisions. A review [J].
Dury, Jerome ;
Schaller, Noemie ;
Garcia, Frederick ;
Reynaud, Arnaud ;
Bergez, Jacques Eric .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 32 (02) :567-580
[7]   Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method [J].
Guitouni, A ;
Martel, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 109 (02) :501-521
[8]   Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification: Adaptive Management for Environmental Change [J].
Lin, Brenda B. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2011, 61 (03) :183-193
[9]  
Mu E., 2017, SPRINGERBRIEFS OPERA
[10]  
Saaty T.L., 2008, Int. J. Serv. Sci., V1, P83, DOI [10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, 10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590]