Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms during routine lumbar CT scan - Modification of the standard technique

被引:16
作者
Gouliamos, AD
Tsiganis, T
Dimakakos, P
Vlahos, LJ
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Areteion Hosp, CT MRI Unit,Dept Radiol, GR-11528 Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Vasc, Surg Clin 2, Athens, Greece
关键词
aneurysm; abdominal; aortic; CT; spine;
D O I
10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00316-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are often incidental findings in patients undergoing US, CT or MRI studies. The recommended field of view (FOV) for standard CT examinations of the spine is 14 cm. This FOV does not allow full visualization of the abdominal aorta. Purpose: To justify a larger FOV for male smokers older than 55 years and women older than 65 years, with a higher incidence of AAA. Materials and methods: The lumbar CT examinations of 100 consecutive patients (age: mean 68 years, range 55-85 years) presented with low-back pain were retrospectively reviewed. Measurements of the abdominal aorta and lumbar abnormalities were analysed. A control study in 850 patients who underwent abdominal CT scans for other causes was available for comparison. Results: There were three men with AAAs measuring 4.5, 5.5 and 5.6 cm (mean 5.2 cm). Findings related to the clinical problem were disk prolapse or herniation, spondylosis, spinal stenosis and grade I spondylolesthesis. In the control group, 17 patients were found with AAAs with diameter greater than 4 cm (2%). Conclusions: Patients with low-back pain, older than 55 years of age, examined with lumbar spine CT, should also be screened for aortic disease, since the prevalence of AAA is similar with that of an age-matched control group. Appropriate modification in the applied FOV is recommended. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 355
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] KARKOS CD, 2000, EUR J VASC ENDOVASC, V19, P200
  • [2] Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening
    Lederle, FA
    Johnson, GR
    Wilson, SE
    Chute, EP
    Littooy, FN
    Bandyk, D
    Krupski, WC
    Barone, GW
    Acher, CW
    Ballard, DJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (06) : 441 - +
  • [3] Marsman J W, 1995, Australas Radiol, V39, P153, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1995.tb00260.x
  • [4] ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM EVALUATION - COMPARISON OF US, CT, MRI, AND ANGIOGRAPHY
    PAVONE, P
    DICESARE, E
    DIRENZI, P
    MARSILI, L
    VENTURA, M
    SPARTERA, C
    PASSARIELLO, R
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1990, 8 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [5] INFLUENCE OF SCREENING ON THE INCIDENCE OF RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - 5-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-STUDY
    SCOTT, RAP
    WILSON, NM
    ASHTON, HA
    KAY, DN
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (08) : 1066 - 1070
  • [6] The influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Wilmink, TBM
    Quick, CRG
    Hubbard, CS
    Day, NE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (02) : 203 - 208