共 100 条
High working memory load impairs reappraisal but facilitates distraction - An event-related potential investigation
被引:13
作者:
Adamczyk, Agnieszka K.
[1
,2
,3
]
Wyczesany, Miroslaw
[2
]
van Peer, Jacobien M.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Psychol, Fac Philosophy, Krakow, Poland
[3] Behavioural Sci Inst, Thomas Aquinostraat 4, NL-6525 GD Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词:
Emotion regulation;
Reappraisal;
Distraction;
Working memory load;
Late positive potential;
COGNITIVE EMOTION REGULATION;
EXPRESSIVE SUPPRESSION;
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES;
EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS;
NEURAL MECHANISMS;
SOCIAL ANXIETY;
DEPRESSION;
FMRI;
NOCICEPTION;
STRATEGIES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108327
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号:
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
The present experiments investigated the impact of working memory (WM) load on emotion regulation (ER) efficacy using reappraisal (Experiment 1, n = 30) and distraction (Experiment 2, n = 30). Considering that WM is necessary for storage, elaboration, and manipulation of information and that reappraisal acts by storing, elaborating, and manipulating the stimulus meaning, we hypothesized that high (versus low) WM-load would reduce reappraisal efficacy. By contrast, given that distraction acts by blocking elaborated processing of the stimulus meaning, we expected that high WM-load would enhance distraction efficacy. To test these predictions, we employed a dual-task paradigm in which a low- or high WM-load task was combined with an ER (reappraisal or distraction) task. We measured the Late Positive Potential (LPP)-an electrocortical marker of sustained motivated attention, and a well-established index of emotional arousal-in response to negative pictures. Results confirmed that although reappraisal successfully reduced the LPP amplitude in the down- compared to upregulation condition in low WM-load trials, high WM-load eliminated this difference, suggesting the disrupting influence of high WM-load on ER for reappraisal (Experiment 1). By contrast, although distraction failed to modulate the LPP amplitude in low WM-load trials, the difference between down- and no-regulation conditions was significant when distraction was combined with high WM-load, suggesting the facilitatory influence of high WM-load on ER for distraction (Experiment 2). Our findings show that the effect of WM-load on ER is strategydependent, and that the availability of WM resources is an important situational moderator of ER efficacy in healthy young adults.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文