Evaluation of a novel particle-based assay for detection of autoantibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

被引:24
作者
Cavazzana, I [1 ]
Richards, M. [2 ]
Bentow, C. [2 ]
Seaman, A. [2 ]
Fredi, M. [1 ,3 ]
Giudizi, M. G. [4 ]
Palterer, B. [4 ]
Pratesi, F. [5 ]
Migliorini, P. [5 ]
Franceschini, F. [1 ,3 ]
Satoh, M. [6 ]
Ceribelli, A. [7 ]
Mahler, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] ASST Spedali Civili, Rheumatol Unit, Brescia, Italy
[2] Inova Diagnost Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Brescia, Dept Clin & Expt Sci, Rheumatol Unit & Chair, Brescia, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Unit Allergol & Clin Immunol, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Pisa, Dept Clincial & Expt Med, Pisa, Italy
[6] Univ Occupat & Environm Hlth, Dept Clin Nursing, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
[7] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr IRCCS, BIOMETRA Dept, Rozzano, Italy
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Myositis; Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; Myositis specific antibodies; Standardization; Immunoprecipitation; Solid phase assays; RHEUMATOLOGY CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA; 2017 EUROPEAN LEAGUE; RHEUMATISM/AMERICAN COLLEGE; LINE BLOT; MYOSITIS; ADULT; POLYMYOSITIS; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jim.2019.112661
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) represent not only important diagnostic tools for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), but also help to stratify patients into subsets with particular clinical features, treatment responses, and disease outcome. Consequently, standardization of MSA is of high importance. Although many laboratories rely on protein immunoprecipitation (IP) for the detection of MSA, IP standardization is challenging and therefore reliable alternatives are mandatory. Recently, we identified significant variation between IP and line immunoassay (LIA) for the detection of MSA and myositis associated antibodies. In this study we aimed to compare the results from our previous study to the results obtained with a novel fully automated particle-based technology for the detection of MSA and MAA. Methods: A total of 54 sera from patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) were tested using three methods: IP, LIA (Euroimmun, Germany) and a novel particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT, Inova Diagnostics, US, research use only). The analysis focused on antibodies to EJ, SRP, Jo-1, NXP-2, MDA5, TIF1-gamma, and Mi-2. Results: Significant variations were observed among all methods. Overall, the novel PMAT assays showed slightly better correlation with IP, but the kappa agreement was strongly dependent on the antibody tested. When the results obtained from IP were used as reference for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, good discrimination and a high area under the curve (AUC) value were found for PMAT (AUC = 0.83, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.70-0.95) which was significantly higher (p = .0332) than the LIA method (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.84). Conclusion: The novel PMAT used to detect a spectrum of MSA in IIM represents a potential alternative to IP and other diagnostic assays. Additional studies based on larger cohorts are needed to fully assess the performance of the novel PMAT system for the detection of autoantibodies in myositis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Anti-signal recognition particle autoantibody ELISA validation and clinical associations [J].
Aggarwal, Rohit ;
Oddis, Chester V. ;
Goudeau, Danielle ;
Fertig, Noreen ;
Metes, Ilinca ;
Stephens, Chad ;
Qi, Zengbiao ;
Koontz, Diane ;
Levesque, Marc C. .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 54 (07) :1194-1199
[2]   POLYMYOSITIS AND DERMATOMYOSITIS .2. [J].
BOHAN, A ;
PETER, JB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1975, 292 (08) :403-407
[3]   POLYMYOSITIS AND DERMATOMYOSITIS .1. [J].
BOHAN, A ;
PETER, JB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1975, 292 (07) :344-347
[4]  
Bottai M, 2017, RMD OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000507
[5]   Testing for myositis specific autoantibodies: Comparison between line blot and immunoprecipitation assays in 57 myositis sera [J].
Cavazzana, Ilaria ;
Fredi, Micaela ;
Ceribelli, Angela ;
Mordenti, Cristina ;
Ferrari, Fabio ;
Carabellese, Nice ;
Tincani, Angela ;
Satoh, Minoru ;
Franceschini, Franco .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 433 :1-5
[6]   Comparison of autoantibody specificities tested by a line blot assay and immunoprecipitation-based algorithm in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies [J].
Espinosa-Ortega, Fabricio ;
Holmqvist, Marie ;
Alexanderson, Helene ;
Storfors, Helena ;
Mimori, Tsuneyo ;
Lundberg, Ingrid E. ;
Ronnelid, Johan .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 (06) :858-+
[7]   Diagnostic performance and validation of autoantibody testing in myositis by a commercial line blot assay [J].
Ghirardello, Anna ;
Rampudda, Mariaelisa ;
Ekholm, Louise ;
Bassi, Nicola ;
Tarricone, Elena ;
Zampieri, Sandra ;
Zen, Margherita ;
Vattemi, Gaetano A. ;
Lundberg, Ingrid E. ;
Doria, Andrea .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (12) :2370-2374
[8]   Antisynthetase syndrome [J].
Imbert-Masseau, A ;
Hamidou, M ;
Agard, C ;
Grolleau, JY ;
Chérin, P .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2003, 70 (03) :161-168
[9]   Response to: 'Performance of the 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in clinical practice' by Hocevar et al [J].
Lundberg, Ingrid E. ;
Bottai, Matteo ;
Tjarnlund, Anna .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2018, 77 (12)
[10]   Classification of myositis [J].
Lundberg, Ingrid E. ;
de Visser, Marianne ;
Werth, Victoria P. .
NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 14 (05) :269-278