Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China

被引:20
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Ling, Zhenhao [2 ]
Deng, Xuejiao [1 ]
Deng, Tao [1 ]
Lyu, Xiaopu [3 ]
Li, Tingyuan [4 ]
Gao, Xiaorong [5 ]
Chen, Xi [6 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Trop & Marine Meteorol, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Prov Meteorol Bur, Ecol Meteorol Ctr, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Meteorol Observ, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
WRF; Community Multiscale Air Quality model; source contribution; unfavorable weather system; fine particulate matter; PEARL RIVER DELTA; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; HONG-KONG; OZONE FORMATION; SOUTHERN CHINA; HAZE EVENTS; VISIBILITY; AEROSOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Historical haze episodes (2013-16) in Guangzhou were examined and classified according to synoptic weather systems. Four types of weather systems were found to be unfavorable, among which "foreside of a cold front" (FC) and "sea high pressure" (SP) were the most frequent (> 75% of the total). Targeted case studies were conducted based on an FC-affected event and an SP-affected event with the aim of understanding the characteristics of the contributions of source regions to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Guangzhou. Four kinds of contributions-namely, emissions outside Guangdong Province (super-region), emissions from the Pearl River Delta region (PRD region), emissions from Guangzhou-Foshan-Shenzhen (GFS region), and emissions from Guangzhou (local)-were investigated using the Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Multiscale Air Quality model. The results showed that the source region contribution differed with different weather systems. SP was a stagnant weather condition, and the source region contribution ratio showed that the local region was a major contributor (37%), while the PRD region, GFS region and the super-region only contributed 8%, 2.8% and 7%, respectively, to PM2.5 concentrations. By contrast, FC favored regional transport. The super-region became noticeable, contributing 34.8%, while the local region decreased to 12%. A simple method was proposed to quantify the relative impact of meteorology and emissions. Meteorology had a 35% impact, compared with an impact of -18% for emissions, when comparing the FC-affected event with that of the SP. The results from this study can provide guidance to policymakers for the implementation of effective control strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1159
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomass burning contributions to urban PM2.5 along the coastal lines of southeastern China
    Wu, Shui-Ping
    Zhang, Yin-Ju
    Schwab, James J.
    Huang, Shuai
    Wei, Ya
    Yuan, Chung-Shin
    TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 2016, 68
  • [42] Impact of PM2.5 chemical compositions on aerosol light scattering in Guangzhou - the largest megacity in South China
    Tao, Jun
    Zhang, Leiming
    Ho, Kinfai
    Zhang, Renjian
    Lin, Zejian
    Zhang, Zhisheng
    Lin, Mang
    Cao, Junji
    Liu, Suixing
    Wang, Gehui
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2014, 135 : 48 - 58
  • [43] Ambient and personal PM2.5 exposure assessment in the Chinese megacity of Guangzhou
    Jahn, Heiko J.
    Kraemer, Alexander
    Chen, Xiao-Cui
    Chan, Chuen-Yu
    Engling, Guenter
    Ward, Tony J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 74 : 402 - 411
  • [44] Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Wuhan, China
    Huang, Fan
    Zhou, Jiabin
    Chen, Nan
    Li, Yuhua
    Li, Kuan
    Wu, Shuiping
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2019, 76 (03) : 245 - 262
  • [45] Quantification of primary and secondary sources to PM2.5 using an improved source regional apportionment method in an industrial city, China
    Hao, Yufang
    Meng, Xiangpeng
    Yu, Xuepu
    Lei, Mingli
    Li, Wenjun
    Yang, Wenwen
    Shi, Fangtian
    Xie, Shaodong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 706
  • [46] Exposure assessment, chemical characterization and source identification of PM2.5 for school children and industrial downwind residents in Guangzhou, China
    Wang, Jia
    Lai, Senchao
    Ke, Zhaoyue
    Zhang, Yingyi
    Yin, Shasha
    Zheng, Junyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2014, 36 (03) : 385 - 397
  • [47] Control of PM2.5 in Guangzhou during the 16th Asian Games period: Implication for hazy weather prevention
    Tao, Jun
    Zhang, Leiming
    Zhang, Zhisheng
    Huang, Ruijin
    Wu, Yunfei
    Zhang, Renjian
    Cao, Junji
    Zhang, Yuanhang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 508 : 57 - 66
  • [48] Outdoor PM2.5 concentration associates with nosocomial bacterial infection in neonates in Guangzhou, China
    Liu, Weiqi
    Liu, Qiaoling
    Liu, Weiling
    Zhuang, Guiying
    Qiu, Cuiqing
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2022, 15 (10) : 1807 - 1815
  • [49] Source analysis and control strategy of VOCs and PM2.5 in high ozone season in industrial zone of Shaoxing city, China
    Zheng, Huajun
    Chen, Di
    Qian, Dongsheng
    Meng, Kai
    Hu, Chenhong
    Li, Shanshan
    Feng, Xinxin
    Xu, Hangxi
    Peng, Qi
    Yu, Hefeng
    Zhang, Yuhao
    Yang, Xinyi
    Elsheery, Nabil I.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2023, 234 (06)
  • [50] Source regional contributions to PM2.5 in a megacity in China using an advanced source regional apportionment method
    Tian, Ying-Ze
    Chen, Gang
    Wang, Hai-Ting
    Huang-Fu, Yan-Qi
    Shi, Guo-Liang
    Han, Bo
    Feng, Yin-Chang
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2016, 147 : 256 - 263