Source Contributions to PM2.5 under Unfavorable Weather Conditions in Guangzhou City, China

被引:20
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Ling, Zhenhao [2 ]
Deng, Xuejiao [1 ]
Deng, Tao [1 ]
Lyu, Xiaopu [3 ]
Li, Tingyuan [4 ]
Gao, Xiaorong [5 ]
Chen, Xi [6 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Trop & Marine Meteorol, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Prov Meteorol Bur, Ecol Meteorol Ctr, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Meteorol Observ, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
WRF; Community Multiscale Air Quality model; source contribution; unfavorable weather system; fine particulate matter; PEARL RIVER DELTA; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; AIR-POLLUTION; HONG-KONG; OZONE FORMATION; SOUTHERN CHINA; HAZE EVENTS; VISIBILITY; AEROSOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-018-7212-9
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Historical haze episodes (2013-16) in Guangzhou were examined and classified according to synoptic weather systems. Four types of weather systems were found to be unfavorable, among which "foreside of a cold front" (FC) and "sea high pressure" (SP) were the most frequent (> 75% of the total). Targeted case studies were conducted based on an FC-affected event and an SP-affected event with the aim of understanding the characteristics of the contributions of source regions to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Guangzhou. Four kinds of contributions-namely, emissions outside Guangdong Province (super-region), emissions from the Pearl River Delta region (PRD region), emissions from Guangzhou-Foshan-Shenzhen (GFS region), and emissions from Guangzhou (local)-were investigated using the Weather Research and Forecasting-Community Multiscale Air Quality model. The results showed that the source region contribution differed with different weather systems. SP was a stagnant weather condition, and the source region contribution ratio showed that the local region was a major contributor (37%), while the PRD region, GFS region and the super-region only contributed 8%, 2.8% and 7%, respectively, to PM2.5 concentrations. By contrast, FC favored regional transport. The super-region became noticeable, contributing 34.8%, while the local region decreased to 12%. A simple method was proposed to quantify the relative impact of meteorology and emissions. Meteorology had a 35% impact, compared with an impact of -18% for emissions, when comparing the FC-affected event with that of the SP. The results from this study can provide guidance to policymakers for the implementation of effective control strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1159
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM2.5 at a Coastal City in Southern Taiwan
    Lu, Hung-Yi
    Lin, Sheng-Lun
    Mwangi, John Kennedy
    Wang, Lin-Chi
    Lin, Hsin-Yi
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2016, 16 (04) : 1022 - 1034
  • [32] Effect of chemical composition of PM2.5 on visibility in Guangzhou, China, 2007 spring
    Tao, Jun
    Ho, Kin-Fai
    Chen, Laiguo
    Zhu, Lihua
    Han, Jinglei
    Xu, Zhencheng
    PARTICUOLOGY, 2009, 7 (01) : 68 - 75
  • [33] Microscopic morphology and size distribution of particles in PM2.5 of Guangzhou City
    Feng, Xidan
    Dang, Zhi
    Huang, Weilin
    Shao, Longyi
    Li, Weijun
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2009, 64 (01) : 37 - 51
  • [34] Stable carbon isotopes and levoglucosan for PM2.5 elemental carbon source apportionments in the largest city of Northwest China
    Zhao, Zhuzi
    Cao, Junji
    Zhang, Ting
    Shen, Zhenxing
    Ni, Haiyan
    Tian, Jie
    Wang, Qiyuan
    Liu, Suixin
    Zhou, Jiamao
    Gu, Jian
    Shen, Ganzhou
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 185 : 253 - 261
  • [35] Refined Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM2.5 in a Typical City in Northwest China
    Wang, Yiting
    Zhang, Yong
    Li, Xia
    Cao, Junji
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [36] Potential Source Analysis for PM10 and PM2.5 in Autumn in a Northern City in China
    Wang, Zong-shuang
    Wu, Ting
    Shi, Guo-liang
    Fu, Xiao
    Tian, Ying-ze
    Feng, Yin-chang
    Wu, Xue-fang
    Wu, Gang
    Bai, Zhi-peng
    Zhang, Wen-jie
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [37] Time Series Assessment of PM2.5 Source Contributions and Classification of Haze Patterns in Seoul
    Lee, Tae-Jung
    Park, Min-Bin
    Kim, Dong-Sool
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 35 (01) : 97 - 124
  • [38] Seasonal Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Ningbo, a Coastal City in Southeast China
    Li, Mengren
    Hu, Min
    Guo, Qingfeng
    Tan, Tianyi
    Du, Bohan
    Huang, Xiaofeng
    He, Lingyan
    Guo, Song
    Wang, Weifeng
    Fan, Yingguo
    Xu, Dandan
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (11) : 2741 - 2752
  • [39] Source apportionment and elemental composition of PM2.5 and PM10 in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia
    Khodeir, Mamdouh
    Shamy, Magdy
    Alghamdi, Mansour
    Zhong, Mianhua
    Sun, Hong
    Costa, Max
    Chen, Lung-Chi
    Maciejczyk, Polina
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2012, 3 (03) : 331 - 340
  • [40] Assessing PM2.5 Dynamics and Source Contributions in Southwestern China: Insights from Winter Haze Analysis
    Guan, Hui
    Chen, Ziyun
    Tian, Jing
    Xiao, Huayun
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (07)