Modal analysis of a submerged spherical point absorber with asymmetric mass distribution

被引:15
作者
Meng, Fantai [1 ]
Ding, Boyin [1 ]
Cazzolato, Benjamin [1 ]
Arjomandi, Maziar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Mech Engn, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Wave energy converter (WEC); Spherical point absorber with asymmetric mass; Hybrid frequency-domain model; Modal analysis; WAVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Of all the wave energy converter (WEC) categories, the single-tether point absorber (PA) is one of the most widely used in the ocean renewable energy industry. In most published research, only the heave motion of the buoy is considered in the motion equation for the analysis. This is because the heave motion of the buoy strongly couples to the power take-off device (PTO), whereas the surge and pitch motions barely couple to the PTO. As a result, only the power arising from heave motion of the buoy can be efficiently absorbed when a single-tether PTO is used, leading to deficiency of the design in absorbing the power arising from its surge and pitch motion. In this paper, the deficiencies of single-tether PAs are addressed by simply shifting the center of gravity of the buoy away from its geometric centre. A spherical buoy with asymmetric mass is used in this paper for its simplicity. The asymmetric mass distribution of the buoy causes motion coupling across surge, heave and pitch motions, which enables strong coupling between the buoy's surge motion and the PTO movement. The operation principle and power generation of the spherical point absorber with asymmetric mass distribution (SPAMD) are investigated via a modal analysis conducted on a validated frequency-domain model. The results show that the SPAMD can be up to 3 times more efficient than the generic PM when subjected to regular waves in the frequency range from 0.34 rad/sec to 1.4 rad/sec. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 237
页数:15
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, OCEAN WAVES OSCILLAT, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511754630
[2]  
Blevins R.D., 2003, APPL FLUID DYNAMICS
[3]  
Evans D., 1979, Applied Ocean Research, V1, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0141-1187(79)90003-8, DOI 10.1016/0141-1187(79)90003-8)]
[4]   A THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE CAPSIZE OF SALTER DUCK IN EXTREME WAVES [J].
GREENHOW, M ;
VINJE, T ;
BREVIG, P ;
TAYLOR, J .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1982, 118 (MAY) :221-239
[5]  
Lee CH, 1995, WAMIT theory manual
[6]   RADIATION AND DIFFRACTION OF WATER-WAVES BY A SUBMERGED SPHERE IN FINITE DEPTH [J].
LINTON, CM .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 1991, 18 (1-2) :61-74
[7]  
Meng F., 2017, TECH REP, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.30587.52006, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.30587.52006]
[8]   THE FORCE EXERTED BY SURFACE WAVES ON PILES [J].
MORISON, JR ;
OBRIEN, MP ;
JOHNSON, JW ;
SCHAAF, SA .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1950, 189 :149-154
[9]  
Nokob M.H., 2012, 22 INT OFFSH POL ENG, P613
[10]  
O'Neil P.V., 2011, Advanced Engineering Mathematics