Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience

被引:26
|
作者
Gollust, Sarah E. [1 ]
Gray, Stacy W. [2 ]
Carere, Deanna Alexis [3 ]
Koenig, Barbara A. [4 ]
Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani [5 ,7 ]
McGuire, Amy L. [9 ]
Sharp, Richard R. [10 ,11 ]
Spector-Bagdady, Kayte [12 ,13 ]
Wang, Na [14 ]
Green, Robert C. [6 ,8 ]
Roberts, J. Scott [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, 420 Delaware St SE,MMC 729, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Beckman Res Inst, City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Monrovia, CA USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Genet Epidemiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth & Aging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Genet, Res Program Translat Genom & Hlth Outcomes G2P, Broad Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[9] Baylor Coll Med, Ctr Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Biomed Eth Program, Ctr Individualized Med Bioeth Program, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Mayo Clin, Clin & Translat Res Eth Program, Rochester, MN USA
[12] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[13] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Program Res Eth, CBSSM, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[14] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Data Coordinating Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[15] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
genetic testing; ethics; regulation; public opinion; SELF-INTEREST; PUBLIC-OPINION; UNITED-STATES; ATTITUDES; POLICY; RISK; IMPACT; PERCEPTIONS; AWARENESS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.12262
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ContextWhile policymakers have been considering the appropriateness of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (DTC-PGT) for more than a decade, there is little empirical data on consumers' views regarding the regulation of these products. No research has assessed whether consumers' personal experience with testing is related to their views about access to and regulation of DTC tests. MethodsData were analyzed from the PGen Study, a longitudinal prospective cohort of DTC-PGT customers of 23andMe (n = 564) and Pathway Genomics (n = 377; total N = 941). Consumers were sent an electronic survey before receiving genetic test results and again 6 months after receipt of results. FindingsAt the 6-month follow-up, more than 80% of participants believed that people have a right to access genetic information directly, that parents should be able to get DTC-PGT testing for their children, and that genetic information should be kept private. Participants supported health insurance coverage of PGT (60%), wider availability of PGT (68%), and inclusion of genetic information in medical records (63%). Participants were less supportive of government regulation (28%) and restricting testing to clinical settings (14%). Conservative political ideology was associated with less support for government regulation (P < 0.001), as was feeling more confident in one's genetic knowledge (P < 0.05). Participants' level of computed genetic risk for common diseases, as indicated by their actual test results received from companies, showed no relationship with attitudes. However, those who perceived that they had received elevated risk results expressed lower support for expanded availability and incorporation of PGT into health care (P < 0.01). Those who reported being upset by their genetic test results were less likely to endorse access to DTC products without a medical professional (P < 0.01). ConclusionsPGT consumers supported expanded access to these services and opposed additional regulation. Users who had a negative personal experience with PGT testing were less supportive of expanded availability without a medical professional.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 318
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Ethics of Direct-to-Consumer Testing
    Gronowski, Ann M.
    Budelier, Melissa M.
    CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 40 (01) : 93 - +
  • [32] Perceived fairness of direct-to-consumer genetic testing business models
    Toussaint, Philipp A.
    Thiebes, Scott
    Schmidt-Kraepelin, Manuel
    Sunyaev, Ali
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2022, 32 (03) : 1621 - 1638
  • [33] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: What Are We Talking About?
    Weaver, Meredith
    Pollin, Toni I.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) : 361 - 366
  • [34] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Finding a Clear Path Forward
    Brendan Seward
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2018, 52 : 482 - 488
  • [35] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Finding a Clear Path Forward
    Seward, Brendan
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (04) : 482 - 488
  • [36] Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: preliminary findings
    Wilde, Alex
    Meiser, Bettina
    Mitchell, Philip B.
    Schofield, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2010, 18 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [37] European citizens' perspectives on direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review
    Hoxhaj, Ilda
    Stojanovic, Jovana
    Boccia, Stefania
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33 (05) : 947 - 953
  • [38] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Introduction to the Special Issue
    Myers, Melanie F.
    Bernhardt, Barbara A.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) : 357 - 360
  • [39] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: regulating offer or use?
    Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
    Borry, Pascal
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (03) : 315 - 317
  • [40] Ethical Issues Associated With Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Panacer, Kirpal S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)