Impact of a new sampling buffer on faecal haemoglobin stability in a colorectal cancer screening programme by the faecal immunochemical test

被引:8
作者
Grazzini, Grazia [1 ]
Ventura, Leonardo [2 ]
Rubeca, Tiziana [3 ]
Rapi, Stefano [4 ]
Cellai, Filippo [3 ]
Di Dia, Pietro P. [1 ]
Mallardi, Beatrice [1 ]
Mantellini, Paola [1 ]
Zappa, Marco [2 ]
Castiglione, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Prevent & Res Inst ISPO, Screening Unit, Via Cosimo Vecchio 2, I-50139 Florence, Italy
[2] Canc Prevent & Res Inst ISPO, Clin & Descript Epidemiol Unit, Florence, Italy
[3] Canc Prevent & Res Inst ISPO, Lab Unit, Florence, Italy
[4] Careggi Hosp, Dept Lab, Gen Lab, Florence, Italy
关键词
cancer prevention; colorectal cancer screening; faecal immunochemical test; sample stability; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE; SEASONAL-VARIATIONS; RETURN TIME; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000257
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Haemoglobin (Hb) stability in faecal samples is an important issue in colorectal cancer screening by the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for Hb. This study evaluated the performance of the FIT-Hb (OC-Sensor Eiken) used in the Florence screening programme by comparing two different formulations of the buffer, both in an analytical and in a clinical setting. In the laboratory simulation, six faecal pools (three in each buffer type) were stored at different temperatures and analysed eight times in 10 replicates over 21 days. In the clinical setting, 7695 screenees returned two samples, using both the old and the new specimen collection device (SCD). In the laboratory simulation, 5 days from sample preparation with the buffer of the old SCD, the Hb concentration decreased by 40% at room temperature (25 degrees C, range 22-28 degrees C) and up to 60% at outside temperature (29 degrees C, range 16-39 degrees C), whereas with the new one, Hb concentration decreased by 10%. In the clinical setting, a higher mean Hb concentration with the new SCD compared with the old one was found (6.3 vs. 5.0 mu g Hb/g faeces, respectively, P < 0.001); no statistically significant difference was found in the probability of having a positive result in the two SCDs. Better Hb stability was observed with the new buffer under laboratory conditions, but no difference was found in the clinical performance. In our study, only marginal advantages arise from the new buffer. Improvements in sample stability represent a significant target in the screening setting. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 291
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer Means Getting FIT: The Past, Present, and Future of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Hemoglobin (FIT)
    Allison, James E.
    Fraser, Callum G.
    Halloran, Stephen P.
    Young, Graeme P.
    [J]. GUT AND LIVER, 2014, 8 (02) : 117 - 130
  • [2] Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test Is Not Decreased by High Ambient Temperature in the Rapid Return System
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Lee, Joung Il
    Joo, Kwang Ro
    Shin, Hyun Phil
    Park, Jae Jun
    Jeun, Jung Won
    Lim, Jun Uk
    Hwang, Sang-Hyun
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (08) : 2178 - 2183
  • [3] Seasonal variations do not affect the superiority of fecal immunochemical tests over guaiac tests for colorectal cancer screening
    Chausserie, Sebastien
    Levillain, Romuald
    Puvinel, Josette
    Ferrand, Olivier
    Ruiz, Angela
    Raginel, Thibaut
    Lantieri, Olivier
    Launoy, Guy
    Guittet, Lydia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (08) : 1827 - 1834
  • [4] Influence of sample return time and ambient temperature on the performance of an immunochemical faecal occult blood test with a new buffer for colorectal cancer screening
    Dancourt, Vincent
    Hamza, Samia
    Manfredi, Sylvain
    Drouillard, Antoine
    Bidan, Jeanne-Marie
    Faivre, Jean
    Lepage, Come
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [5] Improving the reporting of evaluations of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin: the FITTER standard and checklist
    Fraser, Callum G.
    Allison, James E.
    Young, Graeme P.
    Halloran, Stephen P.
    Seaman, Helen E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (01) : 24 - 26
  • [6] Colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in Tuscany: first round results
    Grazzini, G
    Castiglione, G
    Ciabattoni, C
    Franceschini, F
    Giorgi, D
    Gozzi, S
    Mantellini, P
    Lopane, P
    Perco, M
    Rubeca, T
    Salvadori, P
    Visioli, CB
    Zappa, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2004, 13 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [7] Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district
    Grazzini, Grazia
    Ventura, Leonardo
    Zappa, Marco
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Confortini, Massimo
    Rapi, Stefano
    Rubeca, Tiziana
    Visioli, Carmen Beatriz
    Halloran, Stephen P.
    [J]. GUT, 2010, 59 (11) : 1511 - 1515
  • [8] European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Faecal occult blood testing
    Halloran, S. P.
    Launoy, G.
    Zappa, M.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 : SE65 - SE87
  • [9] Prevalence of Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer in Average Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Manns, Braden J.
    Rostom, Alaa
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (12) : 1272 - 1278
  • [10] Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult): An update
    Hewitson, Paul
    Glasziou, Paul
    Watson, Eila
    Towler, Bernie
    Irwig, Les
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (06) : 1541 - 1549