Impact of a new sampling buffer on faecal haemoglobin stability in a colorectal cancer screening programme by the faecal immunochemical test

被引:8
|
作者
Grazzini, Grazia [1 ]
Ventura, Leonardo [2 ]
Rubeca, Tiziana [3 ]
Rapi, Stefano [4 ]
Cellai, Filippo [3 ]
Di Dia, Pietro P. [1 ]
Mallardi, Beatrice [1 ]
Mantellini, Paola [1 ]
Zappa, Marco [2 ]
Castiglione, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Prevent & Res Inst ISPO, Screening Unit, Via Cosimo Vecchio 2, I-50139 Florence, Italy
[2] Canc Prevent & Res Inst ISPO, Clin & Descript Epidemiol Unit, Florence, Italy
[3] Canc Prevent & Res Inst ISPO, Lab Unit, Florence, Italy
[4] Careggi Hosp, Dept Lab, Gen Lab, Florence, Italy
关键词
cancer prevention; colorectal cancer screening; faecal immunochemical test; sample stability; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; AMBIENT-TEMPERATURE; SEASONAL-VARIATIONS; RETURN TIME; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000257
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Haemoglobin (Hb) stability in faecal samples is an important issue in colorectal cancer screening by the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for Hb. This study evaluated the performance of the FIT-Hb (OC-Sensor Eiken) used in the Florence screening programme by comparing two different formulations of the buffer, both in an analytical and in a clinical setting. In the laboratory simulation, six faecal pools (three in each buffer type) were stored at different temperatures and analysed eight times in 10 replicates over 21 days. In the clinical setting, 7695 screenees returned two samples, using both the old and the new specimen collection device (SCD). In the laboratory simulation, 5 days from sample preparation with the buffer of the old SCD, the Hb concentration decreased by 40% at room temperature (25 degrees C, range 22-28 degrees C) and up to 60% at outside temperature (29 degrees C, range 16-39 degrees C), whereas with the new one, Hb concentration decreased by 10%. In the clinical setting, a higher mean Hb concentration with the new SCD compared with the old one was found (6.3 vs. 5.0 mu g Hb/g faeces, respectively, P < 0.001); no statistically significant difference was found in the probability of having a positive result in the two SCDs. Better Hb stability was observed with the new buffer under laboratory conditions, but no difference was found in the clinical performance. In our study, only marginal advantages arise from the new buffer. Improvements in sample stability represent a significant target in the screening setting. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 291
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Faecal immunochemical test outside colorectal cancer screening?
    Pin-Vieito, Noel
    Puga, Manuel
    Fernandez-de-Castro, Daniel
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (38) : 6415 - 6429
  • [2] Faecal immunochemical test outside colorectal cancer screening?
    Noel Pin-Vieito
    Manuel Puga
    Daniel Fernández-de-Castro
    Joaquín Cubiella
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021, (38) : 6415 - 6429
  • [3] Assessment of faecal haemoglobin concentration distributions is vital for faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening programmes
    Fraser, Callum G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2016, 23 (01) : 52 - 53
  • [4] Implementation of a mailed faecal immunochemical test programme for colorectal cancer screening among Veterans
    Deeds, Stefanie Ann
    Moore, Christopher B.
    Gunnink, Eric J.
    Wheat, Chelle L.
    Robinson, Amy E.
    Bomsztyk, Mayan D.
    Geyer, John R.
    Chen, Anders
    Godbout, Regina M.
    Nelson, Karin M.
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    Reddy, Ashok
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [5] Impact of the faecal immunochemical test on colorectal cancer survival
    María Angeles Gutierrez-Stampa
    Vanessa Aguilar
    Cristina Sarasqueta
    Joaquín Cubiella
    Isabel Portillo
    Luis Bujanda
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [6] Impact of the faecal immunochemical test on colorectal cancer survival
    Angeles Gutierrez-Stampa, Maria
    Aguilar, Vanessa
    Sarasqueta, Cristina
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    Portillo, Isabel
    Bujanda, Luis
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Comparison with first round findings of faecal haemoglobin concentrations and clinical outcomes in the second round of a biennial faecal immunochemical test based colorectal cancer screening programme
    Clark, Gavin R. C.
    Fraser, Callum G.
    Strachan, Judith A.
    Steele, Robert J. C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2022, 29 (04) : 249 - 254
  • [8] Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test
    Zorzi, Manuel
    Fedeli, Ugo
    Schievano, Elena
    Bovo, Emanuela
    Guzzinati, Stefano
    Baracco, Susanna
    Fedato, Chiara
    Saugo, Mario
    Tos, Angelo Paolo Dei
    GUT, 2015, 64 (05) : 784 - 790
  • [9] Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical test: Patterns of participation
    Heyman, Hanna
    Blom, Johannes
    Saraste, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2024, 31 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [10] Impact of screening programme using the faecal immunochemical test on stage of colorectal cancer: Results from the IMPATTO study
    Vicentini, Massimo
    Zorzi, Manuel
    Bovo, Emanuela
    Mancuso, Pamela
    Zappa, Marco
    Manneschi, Gianfranco
    Mangone, Lucia
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Grazzini, Grazia
    Mantellini, Paola
    Caldarella, Adele
    Intrieri, Teresa
    Anghinoni, Emanuela
    Senore, Carlo
    Tisano, Francesco
    Ziino, Antonio Colanino
    Malignaggi, Sabina
    Passanisi, Guido
    Rugge, Massimo
    Turrin, Anna
    Piffer, Silvano
    Gentilini, Maria
    Rizzello, Roberto
    Pertile, Riccardo
    Sensi, Flavio
    Cesaraccio, Rosaria
    Interieri, Teresa
    Ferretti, Stefano
    Collina, Natalina
    Petrucci, Chiara
    Fanetti, Anna Clara
    Cecconami, Lorella
    Fusco, Mario
    Vitale, Maria Francesca
    Castaing, Marine
    Ippolito, Antonella
    Varvara, Massimo
    Pesce, Paola
    Filiberti, Rosa
    Borciani, Elisabetta
    Seghini, Pietro
    Stracci, Fabrizio
    Malaspina, Morena
    Serraino, Diego
    Falcini, Fabio
    Giuliani, Orietta
    Pannozzo, Fabio
    Curatella, Simonetta
    Calabretta, Francesca
    Bellardini, Paola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 145 (01) : 110 - 121