Prevalence of frailty syndrome in urological patients undergoing major elective surgical procedure due to malignancy

被引:2
|
作者
Michalik, Cyprian [1 ]
Juszczak, Kajetan [2 ]
Stelmach, Andrzej [1 ]
Kenig, Jakub [3 ]
Drewa, Tomasz [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr & Inst Oncol, Dept Oncol Urol, Krakow, Poland
[2] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol & Androl, 9 Marii Sklodowskiej Curie, PL-85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Dept Gen Surg 3, Krakow, Poland
[4] Nicolaus Copernicus Hosp, Dept Gen & Oncol Urol, Torun, Poland
关键词
urology; surgery; elderly; geriatric assessment; COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; OLDER PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; CANCER-PATIENTS; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; PREOPERATIVE FRAILTY; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; TASK-FORCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.5173/ceju.2022.0021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The group of elderly urological patients is growing. A majority of urological operations is performed in this group. The current model of preoperative assessment is developed to be effective in younger groups of patients but not in the elderly. Frailty syndrome has been confirmed to be an effective risk stratification tool in many surgical settings. It can be diagnosed using a variety of screening tools, but the only objective tool is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). However it is time consuming, difficult and to our best knowledge, has not been attempted in Polish urological patients. Material and methods We assessed the prevalence of frailty in elderly urological patients undergoing surgery due to malignancy using CGA and screening tests. A total of 68 patients over 65 years of age qualified to elective major urological surgery underwent the preoperative assessment including use of traditional tools (medical history, physical examination, ASA score), CGA and frailty-screening tests. The 30-day postoperative complications rate using the Clavien-Dindo scale was also evaluated. Results The mean age of patients was 71 years. The most common procedures were radical prostatectomy (47.1%), radical nephrectomy (36.6%) and radical cystectomy (11.8%). The prevalence of frailty was 39.7% using CGA and 4.4-10.3% using screening tests. The complication rate was significantly higher in frail individuals when using CGA. Conclusions Frailty is common in urological elderly patients. The CGA is a time-consuming but reliable tool to diagnose frailty syndrome and predict complications. Screening tests can be useful for selecting patients who should undergo CGA but their predictive value is low.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of frailty on complications in patients undergoing common urological procedures: a study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database
    Suskind, Anne M.
    Walter, Louise C.
    Jin, Chengshi
    Boscardin, John
    Sen, Saunak
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Finlayson, Emily
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (05) : 836 - 842
  • [32] Risk Factors and Surgical Outcomes of Older Adult Patients Undergoing a Whipple Procedure
    Hakakian, Daniel
    Bellaire, Allison J.
    Elsawwah, Jana K.
    Harrison, Lawrence E.
    Rolandelli, Rolando H.
    Nemeth, Zoltan H.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 118 (03) : 184 - 188
  • [33] Effect of wound protectors on surgical site infection in patients undergoing whipple procedure
    Tee, May C.
    Chen, Leo
    Franko, Jan
    Edwards, Janet P.
    Raman, Shankar
    Ball, Chad G.
    HPB, 2021, 23 (08) : 1185 - 1195
  • [34] Glasgow aneurysm scores in patients undergoing open surgical procedure for aortic aneurysm
    Ozen, Anil
    Unal, Ertekin Utku
    Kubat, Emre
    Turkcan, Basak Soran
    Caliskan, Aytac
    Aytekin, Bahadir
    Aksoyek, Aysen
    Birincioglu, Cemal Levent
    Pac, Mustafa
    VASCULAR, 2015, 23 (03) : 277 - 280
  • [35] Validation of a frailty index in patients undergoing curative surgery for urologic malignancy and comparison with other risk stratification tools
    Lascano, Danny
    Pak, Jamie S.
    Kates, Max
    Finkelstein, Julia B.
    Silva, Mark
    Hagen, Elizabeth
    RoyChoudhury, Arindam
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    DeCastro, G. Joel
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    McKiernan, James M.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (10) : 426.e1 - 426.e12
  • [36] Facing the challenge of venous thromboembolism prevention in patients undergoing major abdominal surgical procedures for gastrointestinal cancer
    Mastoraki, Aikaterini
    Mastoraki, Sotiria
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Patras, Raphael
    Krinos, Nikolaos
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
    Lazaris, Andreas
    Liakakos, Theodore
    Arkadopoulos, Nikolaos
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10 (10) : 328 - 335
  • [37] Effect of adding dopexamine to intraoperative volume expansion in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery
    Stone, MD
    Wilson, RJT
    Cross, J
    Williams, BT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (05) : 619 - 624
  • [38] Impact of preoperative frailty on the surgical and survival outcomes in older patients with solid cancer after elective abdominal surgery
    Hung, Chia-Yen
    Liu, Keng-Hao
    Tsai, Chun-Yi
    Lai, Cheng-Chou
    Hsu, Jun-Te
    Hsu, Chih-Chung
    Hung, Yu-Shin
    Chou, Wen-Chi
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 123 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [39] Association between frailty status and complications in patients undergoing surgical excision of malignant esophageal neoplasms
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Sayed, Sammy
    Nasrollahi, Tania
    Nasrollahi, Tasha
    Huang, Linda
    McGillivray, Erin
    Chour, William
    Foong, Andrew
    Dowlatshahi, Shadi
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, : 517 - 523
  • [40] Impact of Frailty on the First 30 Days of Major Cardiac Events in Elderly Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Hamonangan, Rachmat
    Wijaya, Ika P.
    Setiati, Sitti
    Harimurti, Kuntjoro
    ACTA MEDICA INDONESIANA, 2016, 48 (02) : 91 - 98