FINANCIAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION ON ECONOMIC GROWTH OF THE BALTIC COUNTRIES

被引:6
作者
Slavinskaite, Neringa [1 ]
Lapinskiene, Giedre [1 ]
Hlawiczka, Roman [2 ]
Vasa, Laszlo [3 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Silesian Univ Opava, Sch Business Adm Karvina, Opava, Czech Republic
[3] Szechenyi Istvan Univ, Gyor, Hungary
来源
MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS | 2022年 / 01期
关键词
fiscal decentralization; economic growth; Estonia; Latvia; Lithuania; Baltic States; multiple-criteria decision-making; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; REFORM; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.21272/mmi.2022.1-19
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The management process of fiscal policy incorporates a wide analysis of various factors. The dynamic financial approach should be applied in deciding the level of centralization. The article offers the usage of the multicriteria method in selecting fiscal variables as a new instrument for financial evolution. In this article, the hypothesis of decentralization's impact on economic growth is tested to show the growth opportunities. The implications of the fiscal decentralization index on economic growth across the Baltic States for 2005-2017 were examined using a panel data approach with dynamic effects. The Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) are often considered as a single region with similar economic profiles and common political and social values. They are closely related geographically and historically, particularly during the Soviet era. Although their post-Soviet development has been similar, there are significant differences in local administrative systems and government finances. After restoring independence, the three Baltic countries have been reorganizing their public institutions according to western standards. Each country has some differences in organizing the management of local governments. The study's novelty is emphasized by supplementing the analysis with a fiscal decentralization index, including 24 fiscal decentralization indicators. The fiscal decentralization index ranges from 0.29 to 0.51. Lithuania (0,29) has the lowest fiscal decentralization index, the highest - Latvia (0.52) in the Baltic countries. The investigated model has revealed that the facts considered produce a statistically significant effect. Results showed a negative relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the Baltic States from 2005 to 2017. It should not be forgotten that, in some cases, regions are not capable of implementing green and inclusive growth without the influence of the central government.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 271
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide [J].
Abbott, WS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1925, 18 :265-267
[2]  
Ahmad I., 2020, Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, V30, P95
[3]   Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States [J].
Akai, N ;
Sakata, M .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2002, 52 (01) :93-108
[4]  
Akai N., 2007, Economics of Governance, V8, P339
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Regional Authority in 42 Democracies, 1950-2006
[6]   Revisiting the link between growth and federalism: A Bayesian model averaging approach [J].
Asatryan, Zareh ;
Feld, Lars P. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2015, 43 (03) :772-781
[7]   Decentralization as a constraint to Leviathan: a panel cointegration analysis [J].
Ashworth, John ;
Galli, Emma ;
Padovano, Fabio .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2013, 156 (3-4) :491-516
[8]   GOVERNMENT SPENDING IN A SIMPLE-MODEL OF ENDOGENOUS GROWTH [J].
BARRO, RJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :S103-S125
[9]   Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is There a Relationship? [J].
Baskaran, Thushyanthan ;
Feld, Lars P. .
PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2013, 41 (04) :421-445
[10]   Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach [J].
Besley, T ;
Coate, S .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2003, 87 (12) :2611-2637