Use, Perceived Usability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Patient Safety Dashboard Integrated within a Vendor EHR

被引:31
作者
Bersani, Kerrin [1 ]
Fuller, Theresa E. [1 ]
Garabedian, Pamela [2 ]
Espares, Jenzel [1 ]
Mlaver, Eli [1 ]
Businger, Alexandra [1 ]
Chang, Frank [2 ]
Boxer, Robert B. [1 ,3 ]
Schnock, Kumiko O. [1 ,3 ]
Rozenblum, Ronen [1 ,3 ]
Dykes, Patricia C. [1 ,3 ]
Dalal, Anuj K. [1 ,3 ]
Benneyan, James C. [4 ,5 ]
Lehmann, Lisa S. [6 ]
Gershanik, Esteban F. [1 ,3 ]
Bates, David W. [1 ,3 ]
Schnipper, Jeffrey L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Partners Healthcare, Somerville, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Northeastern Univ, Healthcare Syst Engn Inst, Coll Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Healthcare Syst Engn Inst, Coll Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Vet Affairs New England Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
clinical decision support; health information technology; electronic health record; patient safety; information; data visualization; usability; dashboard; HEALTH INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; ELECTRONIC DASHBOARD; CARE QUALITY; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0039-3402756
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Preventable adverse events continue to be a threat to hospitalized patients. Clinical decision support in the form of dashboards may improve compliance with evidence-based safety practices. However, limited research describes providers' experiences with dashboards integrated into vendor electronic health record (EHR) systems. Objective This study was aimed to describe providers' use and perceived usability of the Patient Safety Dashboard and discuss barriers and facilitators to implementation. Methods The Patient Safety Dashboard was implemented in a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial on 12 units in neurology, oncology, and general medicine services over an 18-month period. Use of the Dashboard was tracked during the implementation period and analyzed in-depth for two 1-week periods to gather a detailed representation of use. Providers' perceptions of tool usability were measured using the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (rated 1-5). Research assistants conducted field observations throughout the duration of the study to describe use and provide insight into tool adoption. Results The Dashboard was used 70% of days the tool was available, with use varying by role, service, and time of day. On general medicine units, nurses logged in throughout the day, with many logins occurring during morning rounds, when not rounding with the care team. Prescribers logged in typically before and after morning rounds. On neurology units, physician assistants accounted for most logins, accessing the Dashboard during daily brief interdisciplinary rounding sessions. Use on oncology units was rare. Satisfaction with the tool was highest for perceived ease of use, with attendings giving the highest rating (4.23). The overall lowest rating was for quality of work life, with nurses rating the tool lowest (2.88). Conclusion This mixed methods analysis provides insight into the use and usability of a dashboard tool integrated within a vendor EHR and can guide future improvements and more successful implementation of these types of tools.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 45
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Rapid-Learning System for Cancer Care
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Etheredge, Lynn M.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Wallace, Paul
    German, Robert R.
    Neti, Chalapathy
    Bach, Peter B.
    Murphy, Sharon B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (27) : 4268 - 4274
  • [2] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019, ADV EV NEAR MISS ERR
  • [3] Supine PCNL is the Way Forward, with Reduced Anesthesia and Operative Times As Compared to Prone PCNL, Along with Comparable Blood Loss and Stone Free Rates
    Awan, Adnan Siddiq
    Khalid, Salman
    Khan, Shariq Anis
    Mithani, Shoaib
    Shaikh, Jahanzeb
    Sharif, Imran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2019, 6 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [4] Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality
    Bates, DW
    Kuperman, GJ
    Wang, S
    Gandhi, T
    Kittler, A
    Volk, L
    Spurr, C
    Khorasani, R
    Tanasijevic, M
    Middleton, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2003, 10 (06) : 523 - 530
  • [5] Usability Evaluation of Visual Representation Formats for Emergency Department Records
    Brown, Nathaniel
    Eghdam, Aboozar
    Koch, Sabine
    [J]. APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 10 (03): : 454 - 470
  • [6] Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety
    Carayon, Pascale
    Wetterneck, Tosha B.
    Rivera-Rodriguez, A. Joy
    Hundt, Ann Schoofs
    Hoonakker, Peter
    Holden, Richard
    Gurses, Ayse P.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (01) : 14 - 25
  • [7] Clinical Dashboards Impact on Workflow, Care Quality, and Patient Safety
    Egan, Marie
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2006, 29 (04) : 354 - 361
  • [8] Few S., DATA VISUALIZATION H
  • [9] Best practices for data visualization: creating and evaluating a report for an evidence-based fall prevention program
    Khasnabish, Srijesa
    Burns, Zoe
    Couch, Madeline
    Mullin, Mary
    Newmark, Randall
    Dykes, Patricia C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (02) : 308 - 314
  • [10] Kohn LT., 2000, To err is human: Building a safer health system