Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: should intracranial pressure be taken into account?

被引:22
|
作者
Lewis, P. M. [1 ]
Smielewski, P. [1 ]
Pickard, J. D. [1 ]
Czosnyka, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Acad Neurosurg Unit, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
autoregulation; intracranial pressure; transcranial Doppler ultrasonography; ARTERIAL-BLOOD-PRESSURE; SEVERE HEAD-INJURY; AUTO-REGULATION; SPONTANEOUS FLUCTUATIONS; BRAIN-INJURY; B-WAVES; FLOW; REACTIVITY; OSCILLATIONS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-007-1160-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Although the inclusion of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is a standard feature in static testing of autoregulation after head injury, controversy surrounds the use of CPP versus arterial blood pressure (ABP) in dynamic tests. The aim of our project was to assess the discrepancies between methods of dynamic autoregulation testing based on CPP or ABP, and study possible differences in their prognostic value. Method. Intermittent recordings of intracranial pressure (ICP), ABP and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (FV) waveforms were made in 151 anaesthetised and ventilated adult head injured patients as part of their required care. Indices of dynamic autoregulation were calculated as a moving correlation coefficient of 60 samples ( total time 3 min) of 6 s mean values of FV and ABP (Mxa) or FV and CPP (Mx). Values of Mx and Mxa were averaged over multiple recordings in each patient and correlated with outcome at 6 months post injury. Findings. Association between Mx and Mxa was moderately strong (r(2) = 0.73). However, limit of 95% accordance between both indices was +/- 0.32. Mxa was significantly greater than Mx (0.22 +/- 0.22 versus 0.062 +/- 0.28; p < 0.000001). The difference between Mx and Mxa decreased with impairment of autoregulation (r = -0.39; p < 0.000001). Mean value of Mx showed a significant difference between dichotomized outcome groups ( better autoregulation in patients with favourable than unfavourable outcome), while Mxa did not. Conclusions. Although relatively similar in a large group of patients, the differences between these two methods of assessment of dynamic autoregulation may be considerable in individual cases. When ICP is monitored, CPP rather than ABP should be included in the calculation of the autoregulatory index.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic cerebral autoregulation: should intracranial pressure be taken into account?
    P. M. Lewis
    P. Smielewski
    J. D. Pickard
    M. Czosnyka
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2007, 149 : 549 - 555
  • [3] Gravity, intracranial pressure, and cerebral autoregulation
    Petersen, Lonnie G.
    Ogoh, Shigehiko
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 7 (06):
  • [4] Impaired cerebral autoregulation, cerebral perfusion pressure, and intracranial pressure in eclampsia
    Jha, Nivedita
    Kumar, Ajay
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (02) : 286 - 287
  • [5] The complexity of intracranial pressure as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation
    Ciarrocchi, Nicolas
    Quiroz, Nicolas
    Traversaro, Francisco
    San Roman, Eduardo
    Risk, Marcelo
    Goldemberg, Fernando
    Redelico, Francisco O.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2019, 75 : 192 - 199
  • [6] Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation based on spontaneous fluctuations in arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure
    Panerai, RB
    Hudson, V
    Fan, L
    Mahony, P
    Yeoman, PM
    Hope, T
    Evans, DH
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 23 (01) : 59 - 72
  • [7] Contribution of intracranial pressure to human dynamic cerebral autoregulation after acute brain injury
    Brasil, Sergio
    Nogueira, Ricardo C.
    Salinet, Angela S. M.
    Yoshikawa, Marcia H.
    Teixeira, Manoel J.
    Paiva, Wellingson
    Malbouisson, Luiz M. S.
    Bor-Seng-Shu, Edson
    Panerai, Ronney B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 324 (02) : R216 - R226
  • [8] Adaptive noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation
    Schmidt, B
    Czosnyka, M
    Raabe, A
    Yahya, H
    Schwarze, JJ
    Sackerer, D
    Sander, D
    Klingelhöfer, J
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [9] The relationship between the intracranial pressure–volume index and cerebral autoregulation
    A. Lavinio
    F. A. Rasulo
    E. De Peri
    M. Czosnyka
    N. Latronico
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2009, 35
  • [10] AUTOREGULATION OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW TO CHANGES OF ARTERIAL AND INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE
    MILLER, JD
    STANEK, AE
    LANGFITT, TW
    FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1971, 30 (02) : A263 - &