Reporting quality of nursing home care by an internet report card

被引:8
作者
Van Nie, Noemi C. [1 ]
Hollands, Louk J. M. [1 ]
Hamers, Jan P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Care & Nursing Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Quality of care; Nursing homes; Internet; Report card; Information for care consumers; CONSUMERS USE; DEMENTIA; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This study was designed to test an internet report card containing information about quality indicators (e.g., pressure ulcers, falls) as well as assessments of consumer satisfaction and of quality of care by the Netherlands Health Care Inspectorate in nursing homes. Methods: Employing a laboratory-type experimental design, 278 current and future consumers and representatives of nursing homes were asked to make quality assessments based on report cards of imaginary nursing homes. They were also asked their opinions of the report cards. Results: The participants were positive about the internet report card and considered it satisfactory. However, they did make some suggestions for improvement, such as using more understandable terminology. It also became evident that the information on the card must be complete; the omission of information resulted in more negative views of the nursing home. Conclusion: The results show that an internet report card call be a useful tool that enables consumers to assess the quality of nursing home care. Further research is needed to examine whether the report card will actually be used by consumers to make decisions regarding nursing home care. Practice implications: The internet report card is a practical tool that can empower consumers, as it facilitates comparisons between nursing homes. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 343
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Carlisle Robert Thomas, 2007, W V Med J, V103, P17
  • [2] Consumers' Use of Internet-Based Nursing Home Report Cards
    Castle, Nicholas G.
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2009, 35 (06) : 316 - 323
  • [3] The Nursing Home Compare Report Card: Consumers' Use and Understanding
    Castle, Nicholas G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2009, 21 (02) : 187 - 208
  • [4] Monitoring quality of care in nursing homes and making information available for the general public: State of the art
    Du Moulin, Monique F. M. T.
    van Haastregt, Jolanda C. M.
    Hamers, Jan P. H.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (03) : 288 - 296
  • [5] A review of psychosocial models in psychogeriatrics:: Implications for care and research
    Finnema, E
    Dröes, RM
    Ribbe, M
    van Tilburg, W
    [J]. ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (02) : 68 - 80
  • [6] Gerteis M, 2007, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V28, P31
  • [7] GROENEWOUD AS, 2005, BOUWSTENEN KWALITEIT
  • [8] GROENEWOUD AS, 2003, PRESTATIE INDICATORE
  • [9] Resident outcomes in small-house nursing homes: A longitudinal evaluation of the initial green house program
    Kane, Rosalie A.
    Lum, Terry Y.
    Cutler, Lois J.
    Degenholtz, Howard B.
    Yu, Tzy-Chyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (06) : 832 - 839
  • [10] Improving the quality of long-term care with better information
    Mor, V
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2005, 83 (03) : 333 - 364