The REFLECT Statement: Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Livestock and Food Safety: Explanation and Elaboration

被引:64
|
作者
Sargeant, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, A. M. [3 ]
Gardner, I. A. [4 ]
Dickson, J. S. [5 ]
Torrence, M. E. [6 ]
Dohoo, I. R. [7 ]
Lefebvre, S. L. [8 ]
Morley, P. S. [9 ]
Ramirez, A. [3 ]
Snedeker, K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Ctr Publ Hlth & Zoonoses, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Iowa State Univ, Vet Med Res Inst, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Meat Lab 215F, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[6] ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20870 USA
[7] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Atlantic Vet Coll, Dept Hlth Management, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
[8] Amer Vet Med Assoc, Schaumburg, IL 60173 USA
[9] Colorado State Univ, Coll Vet Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Clin Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
RIGHT FLANK LAPAROTOMY; INFECTIOUS BOVINE KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS; LAPAROSCOPY-GUIDED ABOMASOPEXY; CONSORT STATEMENT; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SUBGROUP ANALYSES; FIELD TRIAL; DAIRY-COWS; INTRAMAMMARY INFECTIONS; REVISED RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-73.3.579
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Concerns about the completeness and accuracy of reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the impact of poor reporting on decision-making have been documented in the medical field over the past several decades. Experience from RCTs in human medicine would suggest that failure to report critical trial features can be associated with biased estimated effect measures, and there is evidence to suggest similar biases occur in RCTs conducted in livestock populations. In response to these concerns, standardized guidelines for reporting RCTs were developed and implemented in human medicine. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was first published in 1996 with a revised edition published in 2001. The CONSORT statement consists of a 22-item checklist for reporting a RCT and a flow diagram to follow the number of participants at each stage of a trial. An explanation and elaboration document not only defines and discusses the importance of each of the items, but also provides examples of how this information could be supplied in a publication. Differences between human and livestock populations necessitate modifications to the CONSORT statement to maximize its usefulness for RCTs involving livestock. These have been addressed in an extension of the CONSORT statement titled the REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized control trials for livestock and food safety. The modifications made for livestock trials specifically addressed the common use of group housing and group allocation to intervention in livestock studies, the use of a deliberate challenge model in some trials, and common use of non-clinical outcomes, such as contamination with a foodborne pathogen. In addition, the REFLECT statement for RCTs in livestock populations proposed specific terms or further clarified terms as they pertained to livestock studies.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 603
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moher, David
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 698 - 702
  • [42] CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moher, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (08) : 834 - 840
  • [43] CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moher, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 9 (08) : 672 - 677
  • [44] The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
    Liberati, Alessandro
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer
    Mulrow, Cynthia
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Clarke, Mike
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Moher, David
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : b2700
  • [45] Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary Extension
    O'Connor, A. M.
    Sargeant, J. M.
    Dohoo, I. R.
    Erb, H. N.
    Cevallos, M.
    Egger, M.
    Ersboll, A. K.
    Martin, S. W.
    Nielsen, L. R.
    Pearl, D. L.
    Pfeiffer, D. U.
    Sanchez, J.
    Torrence, M. E.
    Vigre, H.
    Waldner, C.
    Ward, M. P.
    ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 63 (08) : 662 - 698
  • [46] Improved Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Urologic Literature
    Narayan, Vikram M.
    Cone, Eugene B.
    Smith, Daniel
    Scales, Charles D., Jr.
    Dahm, Philipp
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 1044 - 1049
  • [47] Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas
    Toulmonde, Maud
    Bellera, Carine
    Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone
    Debled, Marc
    Bui, Binh
    Italiano, Antoine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (09) : 1204 - 1209
  • [48] The adequacy of reporting randomized, controlled trials in the evaluation of antidepressants
    Streiner, DL
    Joffe, R
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1998, 43 (10): : 1026 - 1030
  • [49] Reporting quality of abstracts of veterinary randomized controlled trials
    Maranville, Rachel E.
    Popken, Andrea K.
    Reynders, Reint Meursinge
    Brandao, Joao
    Di Girolamo, Nicola
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 258 (03): : 303 - 309
  • [50] Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery A review
    Kiehna, Erin N.
    Starke, Robert M.
    Pouratian, Nader
    Dumont, Aaron S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 114 (02) : 280 - 285