Calibration of a Finite Element Forward Model in Eddy Current Inspection

被引:2
作者
Hampton, Joel [1 ]
Tesfalem, Henok [1 ]
Dorn, Oliver [2 ]
Fletcher, Adam [1 ]
Peyton, Anthony [1 ]
Brown, Matthew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Math, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] EDF Energy, Gloucester GL4 3RS, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Calibration; Finite element analysis; Conductivity; Coils; Eddy currents; Optimization; Inductance; constrained optimization; eddy currents; finite element model; inverse problem; inductance spectroscopy; CONDUCTIVITY PROFILE; INVERSION; BRICKS;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2022.3167253
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We report on the use of a novel constrained optimisation algorithm for calibrating the finite element model in an eddy current inspection application. An accurate finite element forward model is often important in such eddy current applications for training neural networks or as part of an iterative solver. However, the subject of calibration of the model has not received much attention in the literature to date. We consider a multi-frequency, eddy current depth profiling application, which is important for non-destructive testing in the nuclear industry. In the optimisation algorithm, we use a Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and a bisection search to ensure constraints are satisfied, coupled with a truncated Gradient and Hessian method. We calibrate two types of finite element models, one using a filament representation for the coils and the other using a full 3D approach. The results show the feasibility of using the constrained non-linear optimisation algorithm for tuning the finite element model parameters. The mean signal-noise ratio after tuning on a truncated spectrum was 29.47 dB for the 3D model and 28.96 dB for the filament; in contrast the mean SNR using the measured coil parameters was 1.48 dB and 4.98 dB for the two uncalibrated models, respectively. The results show that a filament model is competitive with a 3D model of the coils (within the nuclear graphite application); therefore, a computationally faster filament model can be used with minimal effect on accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:10699 / 10707
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Andrew R.Conn., 2000, Trust-region Methods
  • [2] Arora J. S., 2017, INTRO OPTIMUM DESIGN, P555
  • [3] Arora Jasbir Singh., 2017, Introduction to Optimum Design, V4A, DOI [DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-15344-5, 10.1016/c2013-0-15344 -5]
  • [4] Cheney M, 1990, Int J Imaging Syst Technol, V2, P66, DOI 10.1002/ima.1850020203
  • [5] An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds
    Coleman, TF
    Li, YY
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 6 (02) : 418 - 445
  • [6] Conn A., 2000, MOS-SIAM SER OPTIMIZ, P169
  • [7] Evaluating the conductivity distribution in isotropic polycrystalline graphite using spectroscopic eddy current technique for monitoring weight loss in advanced gas cooled reactors
    Dekdouk, Bachir
    Chapman, Robert
    Brown, Matthew
    Peyton, Anthony J.
    [J]. NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 51 : 150 - 159
  • [8] Elimination of liftoff effect using a model-based method for eddy current characterization of a plate
    Fan, Mengbao
    Cao, Binghua
    Yang, Panpan
    Li, Wei
    Tian, Guiyun
    [J]. NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 74 : 66 - 71
  • [9] Fletcher A., 2014, NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTI
  • [10] Fletcher R, 2000, PRACTICAL METHODS OP, P139