Detection of back random responding: Effectiveness of MMPI-2 and Personality Assessment Inventory validity indices

被引:61
作者
Clark, ME
Gironda, RJ
Young, RW
机构
[1] James A Haley Vet Affairs Hosp, Chron Pain Rehabil Program 2CW, Psychol Serv, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[4] James A Haley Vet Affairs Hosp, Res & Dev Serv, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Ctr Counseling, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[6] Florida State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.223
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Two experiments examined the detection and effects of back random responding (BRR) on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Experiment I revealed that MMPI-2 Clinical and Content scales were relatively resistant to the effects of BRR. Fb - F greater than or equal to 20T was the most effective index for identifying invalid protocols. Experiment 2 revealed greater susceptibility of the PAI interpretive scales to the effects of BRR and less successful detection of BRR. The most effective PAI validity index was the combined indicator, ICN greater than or equal to 73T or INF greater than or equal to 75T. Clinical and empirical implications of these findings are discussed, and tentative modifications to the MMPI-2 interpretative guidelines are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSMENT
[2]   Characteristics of the MMPI-2 F(p) scale as a function of diagnosis in an inpatient sample of veterans [J].
Arbisi, PA ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1997, 9 (02) :102-105
[3]   An evaluation of the usefulness of the MMPI-2 F(p) scale [J].
Archer, RP ;
Handel, RW ;
Greene, RL ;
Baer, RA ;
Elkins, DE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2001, 76 (02) :282-295
[4]   The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Nicholson, RA ;
Bacchiochi, JR ;
Ryder, AG ;
Bury, AS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 78 (01) :69-86
[5]  
Berry D. T. R., 1992, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V4, P340, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.340, https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.340]
[6]  
BERRY DTR, 1991, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT J, V3, P418, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.418
[7]  
Butcher J.N., 2001, MMPI 2 MINNESOTA MUL
[8]   Methodological problems and issues in MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A research [J].
Butcher, JN ;
Graham, JR ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :320-329
[9]  
BUTCHER JN, 1989, MINNSOTA MULTIPHASIC
[10]  
Cashel ML., 1995, ASSESSMENT, V2, P333, DOI DOI 10.1177/1073191195002004004