Outcomes of perinea' urethrostomy for penile cancer: A 20-year international multicenter experience

被引:10
作者
de Vries, Hielke M. [1 ]
Chipollini, Juan [2 ]
Slongo, Julio [3 ]
Boyd, Franklin [4 ]
Korkes, Fernando [5 ]
Albersen, Maarten [6 ]
Roussel, Eduard [6 ]
Zhu, Yao [7 ]
Ye, Ding-Wei [7 ]
Master, Viraj [8 ]
Le, Thien-Linh [8 ]
Johnstone, Peter A. [9 ]
Muneer, Asif [10 ]
Brouwer, Oscar R. [1 ]
Spiess, Philippe E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Urol, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Urol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Genitourinary Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[5] Fac Med ABC, Dept Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Urol, Leuven, Belgium
[7] Fudan Univ Shanghai, Dept Urol, Ctr Canc, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] Emory Univ, Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[9] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[10] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Urol, London, England
关键词
Penile cancer; Penectomy; Perineal urethrostomy; Complications; Stenosis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is often the definitive form of urinary diversion in patients with locally-advanced or anatomically unfavorable penile cancer (PC) requiring total penectomy. Here, we report post-operative PU-related complications and PU stenosis rates after total penectomy with PU in a large multicenter cohort of PC patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 299 patients who underwent PU as a means of urinary diversion for primary PC across seven international centers from 2000 to 2020. The Clavien-Dindo grading system was used to record 30-day post-operative complications. Cumulative incidence of stenosis was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median patient age was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) 58-74), and median follow-up was 19 months (IQR 7.2-57). A total of 58 patients (19%) developed a 30-day post-operative complication, of which 45 (79%) were deemed minor (CD Grade I and II). Wound infection (11%; CD grade I-III) and dehiscence (4.0%; CD grade I-III) were the more common complications. The overall incidence of stenosis was 12% (35/299 patients), of which 26 (74%) needed surgical revision (probability of stenosis revision at one year of 9.3%, median time until the revision: 6.1 months (IQR 3.0-13)). Only two stenoses were seen after two years of follow-up. Conclusion: We present the most extensive series of PU in the management of PC to date. Wound infections of the primary surgical site were the most common complication. Stenosis occurred mostly within one and a half years after treatment. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500.e9 / 500.e13
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Discovering statistics using SPSS
  • [2] Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life Assessment in Patients Treated With Perineal Urethrostomy for Anterior Urethral Stricture Disease
    Barbagli, Guido
    De Angelis, Michele
    Romano, Giuseppe
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (02) : 548 - 557
  • [3] Blandy J P, 1968, Br J Urol, V40, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1968.tb09886.x
  • [4] Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer translates into better outcomes: a multicenter international study
    Cindolo, Luca
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    Bada, Maida
    Chipollini, Juan J.
    Nyirady, Peter
    Chiodini, Paolo
    Varga, Judith
    Ditonno, Pasquale
    Battaglia, Michele
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Tema, Giorgia
    Veccia, Alessandro
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Musi, Gennaro
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Conti, Andrea
    Micali, Salvatore
    Alvarez-Maestro, Mario
    Quesada Olarte, Jose
    Diogenes, Erico
    Alves Lima, Marcos Venicio
    Tracey, Andrew
    Guruli, Georgi
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Sountoulides, Petros
    Schips, Luigi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (08) : 1649 - 1657
  • [5] Penile Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
    Clark, Peter E.
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    Agarwal, Neeraj
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    Eisenberger, Mario A.
    Greenberg, Richard E.
    Herr, Harry W.
    Inman, Brant A.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Kuzel, Timothy M.
    Lele, Subodh M.
    Michalski, Jeff
    Pagliaro, Lance
    Pal, Sumanta K.
    Patterson, Anthony
    Plimack, Elizabeth R.
    Pohar, Kamal S.
    Porter, Michael P.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Sexton, Wade J.
    Shipley, William U.
    Small, Eric J.
    Trump, Donald L.
    Wile, Geoffrey
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Dwyer, Mary
    Ho, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2013, 11 (05): : 594 - 615
  • [6] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [7] Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer-Does it Affect Survival?
    Djajadiningrat, Rosa S.
    van Werkhoven, Erik
    Meinhardt, Wim
    van Rhijn, Bas W. G.
    Bex, Axel
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Horenblas, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [8] The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 1471 - 1474
  • [9] The "7-Flap" Perineal Urethrostomy
    French, David
    Hudak, Steven J.
    Morey, Allen F.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (06) : 1487 - 1489
  • [10] Changing Trends in Reconstruction of Complex Anterior Urethral Strictures: From Skin Flap to Perineal Urethrostomy
    Fuchs, Joceline S.
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Mckibben, Maxim J.
    Scott, Jeremy M.
    Viers, Boyd
    Pagliara, Travis
    Morey, Allen F.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2018, 122 : 169 - 173