Is perfusion-MRI feasible in lesions with disrupted blood-brain-barrier? Pitfalls and possible solutions.

被引:12
作者
Heiland, S [1 ]
Hartmann, M [1 ]
Sartor, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Abt Neuroradiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2000年 / 172卷 / 10期
关键词
perfusion-MRI; contrast agents; blood-brain barrier; permeability;
D O I
10.1055/s-2000-7899
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Pitfalls and Possible Solutions. Aim: When using perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in lesions with blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption two methods are normally applied to eliminate the influence of contrast material uptake on T-2 * dynamics: injection of contrast agent before starting perfusion imaging (pre-injection) and simultaneous acquisition of T-1- and T-2*-dynamics using a dual echo (DE)-FLASH sequence. The purpose of this study was to examine both methods with regard to their reliability. Material and Methods: We performed four perfusion measurements in a patient with a primary cerebral lymphoma located in the corpus callosum: two measurements with a DE-FLASH sequence and two measurements with a gradient-echo echo-planar-imaging (GE-EPI) sequence, respectively. in both cases there was one measurement with and one without pre-injection of contrast material. Results: Pre-injection of contrast material reduced the influence of T-1 and allowed us to monitor the transient signal drop when using the GE-EPI sequence. Analysis of the timecourse of DE-FLASH, however, showed that there was still a T-1 decrease even after pre-injection. After the first pass the T-2*-dynamics showed a distinct long-term T-2*-decrease. Discussion: Neither pre-injection nor DE-FLASH allow us to eliminate the effects of contrast agent uptake completely. Both methods, however, increase the reliability of perfusion MRI. Their efficacy depends on the extent of the BBB disruption.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 816
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] CEREBRAL BLOOD-VOLUME MAPS OF GLIOMAS - COMPARISON WITH TUMOR GRADE AND HISTOLOGIC-FINDINGS
    ARONEN, HJ
    GAZIT, IE
    LOUIS, DN
    BUCHBINDER, BR
    PARDO, FS
    WEISSKOFF, RM
    HARSH, GR
    COSGROVE, GR
    HALPERN, EF
    HOCHBERG, FH
    ROSEN, BR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [2] ARONEN HJ, 1992, SMRM 11 SCI M, V11, P1129
  • [3] Barbier EL, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V10, P242, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<242::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-H
  • [5] Accuracy of gamma-variate fits to concentration-time curves from dynamic susceptibility-contrast enhanced MRI: Influence of time resolution, maximal signal drop and signal-to-noise
    Benner, T
    Heiland, S
    Erb, G
    Forsting, M
    Sartor, K
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (03) : 307 - 317
  • [6] DETECTION OF RECURRENT GLIOMAS WITH QUANTITATIVE TL-201 TC-99M HMPAO SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY
    CARVALHO, PA
    SCHWARTZ, RB
    ALEXANDER, E
    GARADA, BM
    ZIMMERMAN, RE
    LOEFFLER, JS
    HOLMAN, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 77 (04) : 565 - 570
  • [7] CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW - ASSESSMENT WITH DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED T2-STAR-WEIGHTED MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T
    EDELMAN, RR
    MATTLE, HP
    ATKINSON, DJ
    HILL, T
    FINN, JP
    MAYMAN, C
    RONTHAL, M
    HOOGEWOUD, HM
    KLEEFIELD, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) : 211 - 220
  • [8] GOMORI JM, 1995, INT J NEURORADIOL, V1, P127
  • [9] Simultaneous assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and contrast agent uptake in lesions with disrupted blood-brain-barrier
    Heiland, S
    Benner, T
    Debus, J
    Rempp, K
    Reith, W
    Sartor, K
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [10] Magnetic resonance imaging for stroke: Basis principles and clinical use.
    Heiland, S
    Sartor, K
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1999, 171 (01): : 3 - 14