Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pancreatic Amylase Value on Postoperative Day 1 After Pancreatic Resection to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula

被引:14
作者
Lu, Xiongxiong
Wang, Xinjing
Fang, Yuan
Chen, Hao
Peng, Chenghong
Li, Hongwei
Deng, Xiaxing
Shen, Baiyong
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Pancreat Dis Ctr, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Res Inst Pancreat Dis, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai Inst Digest Surg, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
关键词
DRAIN AMYLASE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; PHASE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000002569
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Early detection of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) may help to improve the outcome following pancreatic surgery, and exclusion of POPF may allow early drain removal which can accelerate recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of drain/plasma pancreatic amylase values on postoperative day 1 (DPA1/PPA1) in POPF by means of a systemic review and meta-analysis. Online journal databases and a manual search up to March 2015 were used. Studies clearly documenting DPA1 or PPA1 in predicting overall POPF (Grade 0 vs A+B+C) or clinically relevant POPF (Grade 0+A vs B+C) following pancreatic surgery were selected. Pooled predictive parameters were performed using STATA 12.0. Fifteen studies were finally identified with a total of 4331 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DPA1 were 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.96) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.86) for predicting overall POPF and 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.90) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.89) for predicting clinically relevant POPF. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PPA1 were 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.82) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.70) for overall POPF. After the DPA1 at/over cutoff values for overall POPF or clinically relevant POPF, corresponding post-test probability (Post-test (+)) (if pretest probability was 50%) was 80% and 82% respectively, while, if values were below the cutoff values, the post-test probability (Post-test (-)) was 10% and 20% respectively. Post-test (+) and Post-test (-) of PPA1 for overall POPF were 66% and 30% respectively. In subgroup analysis, the summary sensitivities of cutoff 1000 group were 0.96 (0.92-0.98) and 0.85 (0.64-0.95), respectively; the summary specificities were 0.59 (0.44-0.72) and 0.86 (0.80-0.91) respectively. Positive LR were 2.3 (1.7-3.3) and 6.2 (3.7-10.2) respectively. Negative LR were 0.06 (0.03-0.14) and 0.18 (0.07-0.47) respectively. DPA1 is a useful predictive test for overall POPF and clinically relevant POPF which has good sensitivity and specificity based on the current studies. Meanwhile, it should be cautiously applied to clinical practice because cutoffs had a wide range between studies.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Diagnostic value of abdominal drainage in individual risk assessment of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Ansorge, C. ;
Nordin, J. Z. ;
Lundell, L. ;
Strommer, L. ;
Rangelova, E. ;
Blomberg, J. ;
del Chiaro, M. ;
Segersvard, R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 (02) :100-108
[2]   Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Molinari, Enrico ;
Malleo, Giuseppe ;
Crippa, Stefano ;
Butturini, Giovanni ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Talamini, Giorgio ;
Pederzoli, Paolo .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) :207-214
[3]   Novel Entirely Continuous Running Suture of Two-Layer Pancreaticojejunostomy Using Only One Polypropylene Monofilament Suture [J].
Chen, Yonghua ;
Tan, Chunlu ;
Zhang, Hao ;
Mai, Gang ;
Ke, Nengwen ;
Liu, Xubao .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (02) :E17-E21
[4]   Postoperative Serum Amylase Predicts Pancreatic Fistula Formation Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Cloyd, Jordan M. ;
Kastenberg, Zachary J. ;
Visser, Brendan C. ;
Poultsides, George A. ;
Norton, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (02) :348-353
[5]   Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy [J].
Dugalic, Vladimir D. ;
Knezevic, Djordje M. ;
Obradovic, Vladan N. ;
Gojnic-Dugalic, Miroslava G. ;
Matic, Slavko V. ;
Pavlovic-Markovic, Aleksandra R. ;
Dugalic, Predrag D. ;
Knezevic, Srbislav M. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (26) :8691-8699
[6]   Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study [J].
El Nakeeb, Ayman ;
Hamdy, Emad ;
Sultan, Ahmad M. ;
Salah, Tarek ;
Askr, Waleed ;
Ezzat, Helmy ;
Said, Mohamed ;
Abu Zeied, Mostaffa ;
Abdallah, Tallat .
HPB, 2014, 16 (08) :713-722
[7]   Pancreatic Anastomotic Leakage after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, Clinical predictors, and Management (Single Center Experience) [J].
El Nakeeb, Ayman ;
Salah, Tarek ;
Sultan, Ahmad ;
El Hemaly, Mohamed ;
Askr, Waleed ;
Ezzat, Helmy ;
Hamdy, Emad ;
Atef, Ehab ;
El Hanafy, Ehab ;
El-Geidie, Ahmed ;
Wahab, Mohamed Abdel ;
Abdallah, Talaat .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) :1405-1418
[8]   Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Figueras, J. ;
Sabater, L. ;
Planellas, P. ;
Munoz-Forner, E. ;
Lopez-Ben, S. ;
Falgueras, L. ;
Sala-Palau, C. ;
Albiol, M. ;
Ortega-Serrano, J. ;
Castro-Gutierrez, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (12) :1597-1605
[9]   Early Drain Removal-The Middle Ground Between the Drain Versus No Drain Debate in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy A Prospective Validation Study [J].
Fong, Zhi Ven ;
Correa-Gallego, Camilo ;
Ferrone, Cristina R. ;
Veillette, Gregory R. ;
Warshaw, Andrew L. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) :378-383
[10]   Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors [J].
Fuks, David ;
Piessen, Guillaume ;
Huet, Emmanuel ;
Tavernier, Marion ;
Zerbib, Philippe ;
Michot, Francis ;
Scotte, Michel ;
Triboulet, Jean-Pierre ;
Mariette, Christophe ;
Chiche, Laurence ;
Salame, Ephraim ;
Segol, Philippe ;
Pruvot, Francois-Rene ;
Mauvais, Francois ;
Roman, Horace ;
Verhaeghe, Pierre ;
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (06) :702-709