Towards Bayesian hierarchical inference of equilibrium climate sensitivity from a combination of CMIP5 climate models and observational data

被引:6
|
作者
Jonko, Alexandra [1 ]
Urban, Nathan M. [2 ]
Nadiga, Balu [2 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Comp Computat & Stat Sci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; COUPLED CLIMATE; CARBON-CYCLE; PROJECTIONS; OCEAN; TEMPERATURES; UNCERTAINTY; ATMOSPHERE; ENSEMBLE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-018-2232-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite decades of research, large multi-model uncertainty remains about the Earth's equilibrium climate sensitivity to carbon dioxide forcing as inferred from state-of-the-art Earth system models (ESMs). Statistical treatments of multi-model uncertainties are often limited to simple ESM averaging approaches. Sometimes models are weighted by how well they reproduce historical climate observations. Here, we propose a novel approach to multi-model combination and uncertainty quantification. Rather than averaging a discrete set of models, our approach samples from a continuous distribution over a reduced space of simple model parameters. We fit the free parameters of a reduced-order climate model to the output of each member of the multi-model ensemble. The reduced-order parameter estimates are then combined using a hierarchical Bayesian statistical model. The result is a multi-model distribution of reduced-model parameters, including climate sensitivity. In effect, the multi-model uncertainty problem within an ensemble of ESMs is converted to a parametric uncertainty problem within a reduced model. The multi-model distribution can then be updated with observational data, combining two independent lines of evidence. We apply this approach to 24 model simulations of global surface temperature and net top-of-atmosphere radiation response to abrupt quadrupling of carbon dioxide, and four historical temperature data sets. Our reduced order model is a 2-layer energy balance model. We present probability distributions of climate sensitivity based on (1) the multi-model ensemble alone and (2) the multi-model ensemble and observations.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 260
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards Bayesian hierarchical inference of equilibrium climate sensitivity from a combination of CMIP5 climate models and observational data
    Alexandra Jonko
    Nathan M. Urban
    Balu Nadiga
    Climatic Change, 2018, 149 : 247 - 260
  • [2] Climate Drift in the CMIP5 Models
    Gupta, Alexander Sen
    Jourdain, Nicolas C.
    Brown, Jaclyn N.
    Monselesan, Didier
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (21) : 8597 - 8615
  • [3] Emergent constraints on transient climate response (TCR) and equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) from historical warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Nijsse, Femke J. M. M.
    Cox, Peter M.
    Williamson, Mark S.
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (03) : 737 - 750
  • [4] Observational estimate of climate sensitivity from changes in the rate of ocean heat uptake and comparison to CMIP5 models
    Troy Masters
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 42 : 2173 - 2181
  • [6] Emergent constraints on equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5: do they mid for CMIP6?
    Schlund, Manuel
    Lauer, Axel
    Gentine, Pierre
    Sherwood, Steven C.
    Eyring, Veronika
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (04) : 1233 - 1258
  • [7] Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models
    Andrews, Timothy
    Gregory, Jonathan M.
    Webb, Mark J.
    Taylor, Karl E.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
  • [8] Bjerknes Compensation in the CMIP5 Climate Models
    Outten, Stephen
    Esau, Igor
    Ottera, Odd Helge
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (21) : 8745 - 8760
  • [9] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Bellenger, H.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Leloup, J.
    Lengaigne, M.
    Vialard, J.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 42 (7-8) : 1999 - 2018
  • [10] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    H. Bellenger
    E. Guilyardi
    J. Leloup
    M. Lengaigne
    J. Vialard
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 42 : 1999 - 2018