River classification: theory, practice, politics

被引:58
作者
Tadaki, Marc [1 ]
Brierley, Gary [1 ]
Cullum, Carola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Sch Environm, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HABITAT SURVEY; RESTORATION; DESIGN; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; QUALITY; REHABILITATION; PRINCIPLES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/wat2.1026
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The classification of river forms and processes has emerged as a major site for interdisciplinary cooperation and application of environmental science. Geomorphologists, ecologists, planners, and others have made concerted efforts to develop theoretical and empirical frameworks with which to classify rivers and their component parts for multiple, diverse applications. As the breadth and depth of classification logics continue to swell, this article takes stock of recent developments through three analytical lenses. First, the theoretical underpinnings of river classification are explored and summarized to provide a framework within which to situate and compare different classification approaches. Second, four emerging frameworks for river classification are described and compared to assess their epistemological, institutional, and governance implications. Different epistemic communities produce different kinds of classifications, which reveal different 'realities' of rivers to be acted upon by human agents. Third, by emphasizing how river classification practices are productive of environmental governance regimes and rationalities, the roles, responsibilities, and possibilities for environmental science are clarified and expanded. Rather than thinking about classification purely as a realist scientific project, attention needs to be paid to the ways in which 'classifying mindsets' relate to the production of social and environmental outcomes. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 367
页数:19
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FIELDS STREAMS STREA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RIVER FUTURES INTEGR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118648551.CH7, 10.1002/9781118648551.ch7]
[4]   Exploring the implications of critical complexity for the study of social-ecological systems [J].
Audouin, Michelle ;
Preiser, Rika ;
Nienaber, Shanna ;
Downsborough, Linda ;
Lanz, Johann ;
Mavengahama, Sydney .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03)
[5]   Applying systematic conservation planning principles to palustrine and inland saline wetlands of New Zealand [J].
Ausseil, Anne-Gaelle E. ;
Chadderton, W. Lindsay ;
Gerbeaux, Philippe ;
Stephens, R. T. Theo ;
Leathwick, John R. .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (01) :142-161
[6]   Developing standard approaches for recording and assessing river hydromorphology: the role of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) [J].
Boon, Philip J. ;
Holmes, Nigel T. H. ;
Raven, Paul J. .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2010, 20 :S55-S61
[7]  
Bouleau G., 2013, GEOFORUM, DOI [10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.1001.1009, DOI 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2013.1001.1009]
[8]   Making sense of policy implementation: The construction and uses of expertise and evidence in managing freshwater environments [J].
Bracken, Louise J. ;
Oughton, Elizabeth A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 30 :10-18
[9]   Reading the landscape: Integrating the theory and practice of geomorphology to develop place-based understandings of river systems [J].
Brierley, Gary ;
Fryirs, Kirstie ;
Cullum, Carola ;
Tadaki, Marc ;
Huang, He Qing ;
Blue, Brendon .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 37 (05) :601-621
[10]   Geomorphology in action: Linking policy with on-the-ground actions through applications of the River Styles framework [J].
Brierley, Gary ;
Fryirs, Kirstie ;
Cook, Nick ;
Outhet, David ;
Raine, Allan ;
Parsons, Lucy ;
Healey, Michael .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 31 (03) :1132-1143