Tree Size Inequality Reduces Forest Productivity: An Analysis Combining Inventory Data for Ten European Species and a Light Competition Model

被引:118
作者
Bourdier, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Cordonnier, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Kunstler, Georges [1 ,2 ]
Piedallu, Christian [3 ]
Lagarrigues, Guillaume [1 ,2 ]
Courbaud, Benoit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Irstea, UR EMGR, Ctr Grenoble, 2 Rue Papeterie BP 76, F-38402 St Martin Dheres, France
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, F-38402 Grenoble, France
[3] AgroParisTech, UMR1092, ENGREF, LERFoB, 14 Rue Girardet,CS14216, FR-54042 Nancy, France
关键词
NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; AREA INCREMENT MODEL; USE EFFICIENCY; PLANT DIVERSITY; STAND STRUCTURE; NORWAY SPRUCE; ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY; CONIFEROUS FORESTS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0151852
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Plant structural diversity is usually considered as beneficial for ecosystem functioning. For instance, numerous studies have reported positive species diversity-productivity relationships in plant communities. However, other aspects of structural diversity such as individual size inequality have been far less investigated. In forests, tree size inequality impacts directly tree growth and asymmetric competition, but consequences on forest productivity are still indeterminate. In addition, the effect of tree size inequality on productivity is likely to vary with species shade-tolerance, a key ecological characteristic controlling asymmetric competition and light resource acquisition. Using plot data from the French National Geographic Agency, we studied the response of stand productivity to size inequality for ten forest species differing in shade tolerance. We fitted a basal area stand production model that included abiotic factors, stand density, stand development stage and a tree size inequality index. Then, using a forest dynamics model we explored whether mechanisms of light interception and light use efficiency could explain the tree size inequality effect observed for three of the ten species studied. Size inequality negatively affected basal area increment for seven out of the ten species investigated. However, this effect was not related to the shade tolerance of these species. According to the model simulations, the negative tree size inequality effect could result both from reduced total stand light interception and reduced light use efficiency. Our results demonstrate that negative relationships between size inequality and productivity may be the rule in tree populations. The lack of effect of shade tolerance indicates compensatory mechanisms between effect on light availability and response to light availability. Such a pattern deserves further investigations for mixed forests where complementarity effects between species are involved. When studying the effect of structural diversity on ecosystem productivity, tree size inequality is a major facet that should be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1970, STUDIES ORGANIC PROD
[2]   Stand structure and biodiversity in mixed, uneven-aged coniferous forests in the eastern Alps [J].
Bagnaresi, U ;
Giannini, R ;
Grassi, G ;
Minotta, G ;
Paffetti, D ;
Prato, EP ;
Placidi, AMP .
FORESTRY, 2002, 75 (04) :357-364
[3]   Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests [J].
Bertrand, Romain ;
Lenoir, Jonathan ;
Piedallu, Christian ;
Riofrio-Dillon, Gabriela ;
de Ruffray, Patrice ;
Vidal, Claude ;
Pierrat, Jean-Claude ;
Gegout, Jean-Claude .
NATURE, 2011, 479 (7374) :517-520
[4]   Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: Why patterns differ for trees and stands [J].
Binkley, Dan ;
Campoe, Otavio Camargo ;
Gspaltl, Martin ;
Forrester, David I. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 288 :5-13
[5]   Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil [J].
Binkley, Dan ;
Stape, Jose Luiz ;
Bauerle, William L. ;
Ryan, Michael G. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 259 (09) :1704-1713
[6]   Improving the behaviour of forest gap models along drought gradients [J].
Bugmann, H ;
Cramer, W .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 103 (2-3) :247-263
[7]  
BUONGIORNO J, 1994, FOREST SCI, V40, P83
[8]   Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection [J].
Burnham, KP ;
Anderson, DR .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2004, 33 (02) :261-304
[9]   Positive interactions among plants [J].
Callaway, RM .
BOTANICAL REVIEW, 1995, 61 (04) :306-349
[10]   Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation [J].
Campoe, Otavio C. ;
Stape, Jose Luiz ;
Albaugh, Timothy J. ;
Allen, H. Lee ;
Fox, Thomas R. ;
Rubilar, Rafael ;
Binkley, Dan .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 288 :43-48