Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected women

被引:15
作者
Bruno, M. [1 ]
Digennaro, M. [2 ]
Tommasi, S. [1 ]
Stea, B. [1 ]
Danese, T. [1 ]
Schittulli, F. [2 ]
Paradiso, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst Bari, Dept Expt Oncol, Bari, Italy
[2] Canc Inst Bari, Woman Dept, Unit Senol, Bari, Italy
关键词
breast cancer; genetic testing; family health history; interest; survey; BRCA1 MUTATION CARRIERS; OVARIAN-CANCER; GENERAL-POPULATION; HEREDITARY BREAST; FAMILY-HISTORY; RISK; DECISIONS; KNOWLEDGE; PERCEPTIONS; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01067.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to evaluate women's awareness and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk, to identify socio-demographic factors, to analyse the reasons for wanting or not wanting to be tested and finally to determine whether breast cancer patients and healthy women have different attitudes towards genetic testing. Consecutive series of 879 women without and with breast cancer participated in a 20-item self-completing questionnaire. Among breast cancer patients, 57% answered that they would definitely or probably accept being tested, compared with 84% of women without breast cancer. At the multiple logistic regression analysis only to have a diagnosis of breast cancer conditioned significantly the interest to have genetic testing. Surprisingly, a family history of breast cancer was found to have no significant impact. The most frequently cited reason for being interested in genetic testing was 'to learn about your children's risk'. Although women's awareness about breast cancer genes is inadequate, the interest in genetic testing is substantial and higher both in healthy women and in women with breast cancer. These results provide important indications for the development of educational strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 368
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Interest in learning of personal genetic risk for cancer: A general population survey
    Andrykowski, MA
    Munn, RK
    Studts, JL
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 25 (05) : 527 - 536
  • [2] Hereditary cancer risk notification and testing: How interested is the general population?
    Andrykowski, MA
    Lightner, R
    Studts, JL
    Munn, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) : 2139 - 2148
  • [3] Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies
    Antoniou, A
    Pharoah, PDP
    Narod, S
    Risch, HA
    Eyfjord, JE
    Hopper, JL
    Loman, N
    Olsson, H
    Johannsson, O
    Borg, Å
    Pasini, B
    Radice, P
    Manoukian, S
    Eccles, DM
    Tang, N
    Olah, E
    Anton-Culver, H
    Warner, E
    Lubinski, J
    Gronwald, J
    Gorski, B
    Tulinius, H
    Thorlacius, S
    Eerola, H
    Nevanlinna, H
    Syrjäkoski, K
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Thompson, D
    Evans, C
    Peto, J
    Lalloo, F
    Evans, DG
    Easton, DF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) : 1117 - 1130
  • [4] Armstrong K, 2000, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V9, P1251
  • [5] Bottorff JL, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P89
  • [6] Brose MS, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1365, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1365
  • [7] BRUNO M, 2004, ANN ONCOL S1, V15, P48, DOI DOI 10.1093/ANNONC/MDH658
  • [8] Psychological and social determinants of women's decisions to undergo genetic counseling and testing for breast cancer
    Cappelli, M
    Surh, L
    Humphreys, L
    Verma, S
    Logan, D
    Hunter, A
    Allanson, J
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 1999, 55 (06) : 419 - 430
  • [9] WOMENS RECEPTIVITY TO TESTING FOR A GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BREAST-CANCER
    CHALIKI, H
    LOADER, S
    LEVENKRON, JC
    LOGANYOUNG, W
    HALL, WJ
    ROWLEY, PT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (08) : 1133 - 1135
  • [10] Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample
    Donovan, KA
    Tucker, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 23 (01) : 15 - 36