The impact of parent-only interventions on child anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:20
|
作者
Jewell, C. [1 ,2 ]
Wittkowski, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pratt, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Ctr New Treatments & Understanding Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Greater Manchester Mental Hlth Fdn Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Parenting; Childhood anxiety disorder; Intervention; Outcomes; Treatment; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; ANXIOUS CHILDREN; DISORDERS; INVOLVEMENT; BIAS; CBT; SYMPTOMS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.082
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Parent-only interventions for childhood anxiety may be an important alternative to resource and time intensive child-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of parent-only interventions in reducing symptoms of anxiety disorders in school-aged children.Methods: A systematic search of five databases (inception to March 2021) identified 29 eligible studies. A range of study designs were captured, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and case series. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on parent-and child-reported outcomes and pretest post-test effect sizes were calculated for uncontrolled studies.Results: Findings indicated a significant treatment effect for parent-only interventions compared to waitlist controls. No significant differences were found when comparing parent-only interventions with other active interventions; anxiety symptoms reduced in both conditions. No significant treatment effects were found for child-rated outcomes. Calculated effect sizes for uncontrolled studies were typically large, although sample sizes were small. No clear evidence was found for a superior type, duration or format of intervention. Limitations: The methodological quality of many studies in this review (19/29) was rated 'weak'. Only English language papers were included.Conclusions: To date, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of parent-only interventions for reducing symptoms of child anxiety disorders. Our results suggest that parent-only interventions may be effective in reducing child anxiety. These findings are important for clinical practice because they suggest that efficient, low intensity interventions delivered to parents may lead to positive outcomes for children.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 349
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Child-Parent Interventions for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Brendel, Kristen Esposito
    Maynard, Brandy R.
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2014, 24 (03) : 287 - 295
  • [2] Psychosocial Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure and Their Impact on Depression, Anxiety, Quality of Life, Morbidity, and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chernoff, Robert Alan
    Messineo, Gabrielle
    Kim, Sungjin
    Pizano, Demetria
    Korouri, Samuel
    Danovitch, Itai
    IsHak, Waguih William
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2022, 84 (05): : 560 - 580
  • [3] Parent-only vs. parent-child (family-focused) approaches for weight loss in obese and overweight children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jull, A.
    Chen, R.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2013, 14 (09) : 761 - 768
  • [4] Parent-only interventions in the treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Ewald, H.
    Kirby, J.
    Rees, K.
    Robertson, W.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 36 (03) : 476 - 489
  • [5] Child and parent outcomes following parent interventions for child emotional and behavioral problems in autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tarver, Joanne
    Palmer, Melanie
    Webb, Sophie
    Scott, Stephen
    Slonims, Vicky
    Simonoff, Emily
    Charman, Tony
    AUTISM, 2019, 23 (07) : 1630 - 1644
  • [6] Like parent, like child: Is parent interpretation bias associated with their child's interpretation bias and anxiety? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Subar, Anni R.
    Rozenman, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 291 : 307 - 314
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for depression and anxiety in persons with multiple sclerosis
    Fiest, K. M.
    Walker, J. R.
    Bernstein, C. N.
    Graff, L. A.
    Zarychanski, R.
    Abou-Setta, A. M.
    Patten, S. B.
    Sareen, J.
    Bolton, J. M.
    Marriott, J. J.
    Fisk, J. D.
    Singer, A.
    Marrie, R. A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2016, 5 : 12 - 26
  • [8] Cognitive Behavioral Digital Interventions are Effective in Reducing Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Csirmaz, Luca
    Nagy, Tamas
    Vikor, Fanni
    Kasos, Krisztian
    JOURNAL OF PREVENTION, 2024, 45 (02): : 237 - 267
  • [9] The impact of interventions for depression on self-perceptions in young people: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Dean, R. L.
    Lester, K. J.
    Grant, E.
    Field, A. P.
    Orchard, F.
    Pile, V.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2025, 115
  • [10] A co-designed systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of grief interventions for anxiety and depression in young people
    Breen, Lauren J.
    Greene, Danyelle
    Rees, Clare S.
    Black, Amy
    Cawthorne, Morgan
    Egan, Sarah J.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2023, 335 : 289 - 297