Teacher coping profiles in relation to teacher well-being: A mixed method approach

被引:42
作者
Aulen, Anna-Mari [1 ]
Pakarinen, Eija [1 ]
Feldt, Taru [2 ]
Lerkkanen, Marja-Kristiina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Teacher Educ, POB 35, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Psychol, Jyvaskyla, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Teacher; Coping; Well-being; Mixed methods; Latent profile analysis; SELF-EFFICACY; SCHOOL TEACHERS; OCCUPATIONAL STRESS; WORK-ENVIRONMENT; STRATEGIES; BURNOUT; STYLES; EDUCATION; VALIDITY; EMOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tate.2021.103323
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim was to investigate teachers? coping profiles and their relations to teacher well-being. Questionnaire data was collected from 107 Finnish teachers. Theory-driven content analysis of teachers? responses revealed three coping categories: problem-focused, emotion-focused and mixed problem-and emotion-focused. Next, teachers were categorized into four coping profiles by using latent profile analysis: Low-coping users (21%), Problem-focused-coping users (15%), High-coping users (12%) and Emotion-focused-coping users (52%). Low-coping-user teachers reported less stress and fewer depressive symptoms and sleep problems compared to Emotion-focused-coping users. Using a compact amount of coping strategies and problem-focused strategies aside of emotion-focused might be beneficial for teacher well-being. ? 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). The aim was to investigate teachers? coping profiles and their relations to teacher well-being. Questionnaire data was collected from 107 Finnish teachers. Theory-driven content analysis of teachers? responses revealed three coping categories: problem-focused, emotion-focused and mixed problem- and emotion-focused. Next, teachers were categorized into four coping profiles by using latent profile analysis: Low-coping users (21%), Problem-focused-coping users (15%), High-coping users (12%) and Emotion-focused-coping users (52%). Low-coping-user teachers reported less stress and fewer depressive symptoms and sleep problems compared to Emotion-focused-coping users. Using a compact amount of coping strategies and problem-focused strategies aside of emotion-focused might be beneficial for teacher well-being. ? 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Alghaswyneh Sawsan., 2012, Teacher stress among Tawjihi teachers in Jordan and their adopted coping strategies to reduce stress
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OAJ N JULKAISUSARJA
[3]  
Antoniou AS, 2009, INT J SPEC EDUC, V24, P100
[4]  
Austin Vicky, 2005, Occup Ther Int, V12, P63, DOI 10.1002/oti.16
[5]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[6]  
Bergman L.R., 2003, STUDYING INDIVIDUAL
[7]   Towards a model of teacher well-being: personal and job resources involved in teacher burnout and engagement [J].
Bermejo-Toro, Laura ;
Prieto-Ursua, Maria ;
Hernandez, Vicente .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 36 (03) :481-501
[8]   The mistreated teacher: a national study [J].
Blase, Jo ;
Blase, Joseph ;
Du, Fengning .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 46 (03) :263-+
[9]  
Brackenreed D, 2011, CAN J EDUC ADM POLIC, P1
[10]  
Bryman A., 2006, Qual. Res, V6, P97, DOI DOI 10.1177/1468794106058877