Challenges and Opportunities in the Global Regulation of Crop Protection Products

被引:14
作者
Gehen, Sean [1 ]
Corvaro, Marco [1 ]
Jones, Jennifer [2 ]
Ma, Mingming [1 ]
Yang, Qiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Corteva Agrisci, Crop Protect Regulatory Sci, 9330 Zionsville Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46268 USA
[2] Corteva Agrisci, Prod Design & Proc R&D, 9330 Zionsville Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46268 USA
关键词
crop protection; regulatory; mammalian toxicology; ecotoxicology; environmental fate; residue chemistry; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SYSTEMIC TOXICITY; RISK-ASSESSMENT; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00284
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Crop protection active ingredients and formulated products are essential tools for modern agriculture that serve to prevent yield loss related to insect, weed, or fungal pest pressure. Prior to commercialization, crop protection products must be authorized or registered across various regulatory jurisdictions globally. Registration decisions are based on the results of comprehensive testing requirements across multiple scientific disciplines. Full characterization of physical/chemical properties must be conducted, and specifications must be put in place for active ingredient purity and impurity levels. Additionally, studies to assess fate, behavior, and transformation in relevant environmental matrices are conducted. Hazard properties are identified by conducting multiple toxicology studies utilizing in vitro test systems as well as relevant invertebrate and vertebrate species. Hazard end points derived from these studies are then assessed relative to the exposure potential of the chemical obtained through empirical measurements or use of well-validated models. Taken together, the hazard and exposure profiles are used ultimately to assess risk to nontarget organisms as well as humans. If necessary, exposure assessments can be refined in several ways, for example, by conducting more comprehensive OECD test guideline studies to provide more refined end points, using sophisticated modeling approaches (e.g., probabilistic models), and implementing mitigation measures to reduce the potential for exposure. Looking forward, new crop protection technologies, including purified stereoisomer products, provide the opportunity to increase specificity against target pests and reduce potential off-target interactions. The rigorous process in place for assessment and registration of crop protection products provides a strong basis to ensure that under appropriate use conditions the benefits of the product can be realized without unacceptable risk to the environment or human health.
引用
收藏
页码:2225 / 2233
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, COST NEW AGR PROD DI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, OECD PRINC GOOD LAB
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, 228 FAO WHO
  • [4] Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Report of an ECETOC workshop
    Buesen, Roland
    Chorley, Brian N.
    Lima, Beatriz da Silva
    Daston, George
    Deferme, Lize
    Ebbels, Timothy
    Gant, Timothy W.
    Goetz, Amber
    Greally, John
    Gribaldo, Laura
    Hackermueller, Joerg
    Hubesch, Bruno
    Jennen, Danyel
    Johnson, Kamin
    Kanno, Jun
    Kauffmann, Hans-Martin
    Laffont, Madeleine
    McMullen, Patrick
    Meehan, Richard
    Pemberton, Mark
    Perdichizzi, Stefania
    Piersma, Aldert H.
    Sauer, Ursula G.
    Schmidt, Kerstin
    Seitz, Herve
    Sumida, Kayo
    Tollefsen, Knut E.
    Tong, Weida
    Tralau, Tewes
    van Ravenzwaay, Ben
    Weber, Ralf J. M.
    Worth, Andrew
    Yauk, Carole
    Poole, Alan
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 91 : S3 - S13
  • [5] A retrospective analysis of in vivo eye irritation, skin irritation and skin sensitisation studies with agrochemical formulations: Setting the scene for development of alternative strategies
    Corvaro, M.
    Gehen, S.
    Andrews, K.
    Chatfield, R.
    Macleod, F.
    Mehta, J.
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 89 : 131 - 147
  • [6] GHS additivity formula: A true replacement method for acute systemic toxicity testing of agrochemical formulations
    Corvaro, M.
    Gehen, S.
    Andrews, K.
    Chatfield, R.
    Arasti, C.
    Mehta, J.
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 82 : 99 - 110
  • [7] Acute toxicity testing of chemicals-Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches
    Creton, Stuart
    Dewhurst, Ian C.
    Earl, Lesley K.
    Gehen, Sean C.
    Guest, Robert L.
    Hotchkiss, Jon A.
    Indans, Ian
    Woolhiser, Michael R.
    Billington, Richard
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 40 (01) : 50 - 83
  • [8] Risk assessment in the 21st century: Roadmap and matrix
    Embry, Michelle R.
    Bachman, Ammie N.
    Bell, David R.
    Boobis, Alan R.
    Cohen, Samuel M.
    Dellarco, Michael
    Dewhurst, Ian C.
    Doerrer, Nancy G.
    Hines, Ronald N.
    Moretto, Angelo
    Pastoor, Timothy P.
    Phillips, Richard D.
    Rowlands, J. Craig
    Tanir, Jennifer Y.
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    Doe, John E.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 44 : 6 - 16
  • [9] Solutions for a cultivated planet
    Foley, Jonathan A.
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Brauman, Kate A.
    Cassidy, Emily S.
    Gerber, James S.
    Johnston, Matt
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    O'Connell, Christine
    Ray, Deepak K.
    West, Paul C.
    Balzer, Christian
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Hill, Jason
    Monfreda, Chad
    Polasky, Stephen
    Rockstrom, Johan
    Sheehan, John
    Siebert, Stefan
    Tilman, David
    Zaks, David P. M.
    [J]. NATURE, 2011, 478 (7369) : 337 - 342
  • [10] Evidence for the effect of sorption enantioselectivity on the availability of chiral pesticide enantiomers in soil
    Gamiz, Beatriz
    Facenda, Gracia
    Celis, Rafael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 213 : 966 - 973