CFD code comparison for 2D airfoil flows

被引：21
|
作者：
Sorensen, Niels N. [1 ]
Mendez, B. [2 ]
Munoz, A. [2 ]
Sieros, G. [3 ]
Jost, E. [4 ]
Lutz, T. [4 ]
Papadakis, G. [5 ]
Voutsinas, S. [5 ]
Barakos, G. N. [6 ]
Colonia, S. [6 ]
Baldacchino, D. [7 ]
Baptista, C. [7 ]
Ferreira, C. [7 ]
机构：
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Wind Energy, Riso Campus, Lyngby, Denmark
[2] CENER, Av Ciudad Innovac 7,Sarriguren 31621, Navarra, Spain
[3] CRES, Wind Energy Dept, Pikermi, Greece
[4] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Aerodynam & Gas Dynam, Stuttgart, Germany
[5] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Athens, Greece
[6] Univ Glasgow, Sch Engn, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[7] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
来源：
SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND (TORQUE 2016) | 2016年 / 753卷
关键词：
EQUATIONS;
D O I：
10.1088/1742-6596/753/8/082019
中图分类号：
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号：
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要：
The current paper presents the effort, in the EU AVATAR project, to establish the necessary requirements to obtain consistent lift over drag ratios among seven CFD codes. The flow around a 2D airfoil case is studied, for both transitional and fully turbulent conditions at Reynolds numbers of 3 x 10(6) and 15 x 10(6). The necessary grid resolution, domain size, and iterative convergence criteria to have consistent results are discussed, and suggestions are given for best practice. For the fully turbulent results four out of seven codes provide consistent results. For the laminar-turbulent transitional results only three out of seven provided results, and the agreement is generally lower than for the fully turbulent case.
引用
收藏
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
12345