Assessment of conjunctival goblet cell density using laser scanning confocal microscopy versus impression cytology

被引:23
作者
Colorado, Luisa H.
Alzahrani, Yahya
Pritchard, Nicola
Efron, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
Conjunctiva; Goblet cells; Laser scanning confocal microscopy; Impression cytology; CONTACT-LENS WEAR; OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE; AGE-RELATED-CHANGES; IN-VIVO; DRY EYE; BULBAR CONJUNCTIVA; MEIBOMIAN GLANDS; VALIDATION; SYMPTOMS; MUCINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2016.01.006
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the association between conjunctival goblet cell density (GCD) assessed using in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy and conjunctival impression cytology in a healthy population. Methods: Ninety (90) healthy participants undertook a validated 5-item dry eye questionnaire, non-invasive tear film break-up time measurement, ocular surface fluorescein staining and phenol red thread test. These tests where undertaken to diagnose and exclude participants with dry eye. The nasal bulbar conjunctiva was imaged using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed in the same region a few minutes later. Conjunctival goblet cell density was calculated as cells/mm(2). Results: There was a strong positive correlation of conjunctival GCD between LSCM and CIC (rho = 0.66). Conjunctival goblet cell density was 475 +/- 41 cells/mm(2) and 466 +/- 51 cells/mm(2) measured by LSCM and CIC, respectively. Conclusions: The strong association between in vivo and in vitro cellular analysis for measuring conjunctival GCD suggests that the more invasive CIC can be replaced by the less invasive LSCM in research and clinical practice. (C) 2016 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 226
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Albietz Julie M., 2001, CLAO Journal, V27, P35
[2]  
Bjerrum KB, 1996, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V74, P436
[3]  
Blades KJ, 1996, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V16, P409, DOI 10.1016/0275-5408(96)00006-3
[4]  
Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
[5]   Validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses [J].
Chalmers, Robin L. ;
Begley, Carolyn G. ;
Caffery, Barbara .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2010, 33 (02) :55-60
[6]   An in vivo confocal microscopy and impression cytology analysis of preserved and unpreserved levobunolol-induced conjunctival changes [J].
Ciancaglini, M. ;
Carpineto, P. ;
Agnifili, L. ;
Nubile, M. ;
Fasanella, V. ;
Lanzini, M. ;
Calienno, R. ;
Mastropasqua, L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) :400-407
[7]   Conjunctival Mucin mRNA Expression in Contact Lens Wear [J].
Corrales, Rosa M. ;
Galarreta, David ;
Herreras, Jose M. ;
Saez, Victoria ;
Arranz, Isabel ;
Gonzalez, Maria J. ;
Mayo, Agustin ;
Calonge, Margarita ;
Chaves, Felipe J. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2009, 86 (09) :1051-1058
[8]   Goblet Cells of the Normal Human Bulbar Conjunctiva and Their Assessment by Impression Cytology Sampling [J].
Doughty, Michael J. .
OCULAR SURFACE, 2012, 10 (03) :149-169
[9]   Sampling Area Selection for the Assessment of Goblet Cell Density From Conjunctival Impression Cytology Specimens [J].
Doughty, Michael J. .
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 38 (02) :122-129
[10]   Contact lens wear and the goblet cells of the human conjunctiva-A review [J].
Doughty, Michael J. .
CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2011, 34 (04) :157-163