An adaptive space preselection method for the multi-fidelity global optimization

被引:8
作者
Wu, Yuda [1 ]
Lin, Quan [1 ]
Zhou, Qi [1 ]
Hu, Jiexiang [1 ]
Wang, Shengyi [1 ]
Peng, Yutong [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Aerosp Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Digital Mfg Equipment & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Multi-fidelity metamodel; Space preselection; Bootstrap; Constrained optimization; Lower confidence bounding; DESIGN; OUTPUT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2021.106728
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Multi-fidelity (MF) metamodels have been well applied to aerospace structure optimization problems to relieve the computation burden. However, most of the existing multi-fidelity optimization methods explore the optimum in the whole design space, which may lead to low-efficiency of the optimization search. In this paper, a space preselection-based multi-fidelity lower confidence bounding (SPMF-LCB) optimization method is proposed to solve this problem. Firstly, a bootstrap-assisted area selection algorithm is proposed, which can adaptively partition the whole design space and select the most potential area to facilitate the optimization process. Secondly, the lower confidence bounding (LCB) method is extended to the multi-fidelity level, which can adaptively determine both the fidelity level and the location of sample points, with the consideration of the low-fidelity (LF) simulations budget. Finally, the probability of feasible (POF) method is combined with the extended LCB method to handle the constrained optimization problems. Eight analytical examples and the optimization problem of the radome of the missile are utilized to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed SPMF-LCB method. The performance of the proposed approach is compared with four existing methods. Results show that the proposed SPMF-LCB method performs the best considering the efficiency and robustness. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Ackley D., 2012, CONNECTIONIST MACHIN
[2]   An Introduction to the Space Mapping Technique [J].
Bakr, Mohamed H. ;
Bandler, John W. ;
Madsen, Kaj ;
Sondergaard, Jacob .
OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 2 (04) :369-384
[3]   All-at-once approach to multifidelity polynomial chaos expansion surrogate modeling [J].
Bryson, Dean E. ;
Rumpfkeil, Markus P. .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 70 :121-136
[4]   Research on Simulation Method of Missile Adapter's Separation Based on Combined Calculation [J].
Chen, Miao ;
Jiang, Yi ;
Shi, Shaoyan ;
Zeng, Wei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
[5]  
COX DD, 1992, 1992 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1241, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.1992.271617
[6]   The correct Kriging variance estimated by bootstrapping [J].
den Hertog, D ;
Kleijnen, JPC ;
Siem, AYD .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2006, 57 (04) :400-409
[7]  
Fernandez-Godino MG, 2016, ARXIV160907196
[8]   Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling [J].
Forrester, Alexander I. J. ;
Sobester, Andras ;
Keane, Andy J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 463 (2088) :3251-3269
[9]   Hybrid variable fidelity optimization by using a kriging-based scaling function [J].
Gano, SE ;
Renaud, JE ;
Sanders, B .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (11) :2422-2430
[10]  
Haftka R.T., 2018, AIAA ASCE AHS ASC ST