The effect of temperature and wing morphology on quantitative genetic variation in the cricket Gryllus firmus, with an appendix examining the statistical properties of the Jackknife-manova method of matrix comparison

被引:32
作者
Bégin, M
Roff, DA
Debat, V
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Biol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1B1, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Biol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
additive genetic variation; body size; common principal components; G matrix; genetic correlation; heritability; Orthoptera; phenotypic plasticity; wing dimorphism;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00772.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We investigated the effect of temperature and wing morphology on the quantitative genetic variances and covariances of five size-related traits in the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. Micropterous and macropterous crickets were reared in the laboratory at 24, 28 and 32 degreesC. Quantitative genetic parameters were estimated using a nested full-sib family design, and (co)variance matrices were compared using the T method, Flury hierarchy and Jackknife-MANOVA method. The results revealed that the mean phenotypic value of each trait varied significantly among temperatures and wing morphs, but temperature reaction norms were not similar across all traits. Micropterous individuals were always smaller than macropterous individuals while expressing more phenotypic variation, a finding discussed in terms of canalization and life-history trade-offs. We observed little variation between the matrices of among-family (co)variation corresponding to each combination of temperature and wing morphology, with only one matrix of six differing in structure from the others. The implications of this result are discussed with respect to the prediction of evolutionary trajectories.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1267
页数:13
相关论文
共 93 条
[21]   DOMINANCE VARIANCE - ASSOCIATIONS WITH SELECTION AND FITNESS [J].
CRNOKRAK, P ;
ROFF, DA .
HEREDITY, 1995, 75 :530-540
[22]   REACTION NORMS OF SIZE CHARACTERS IN RELATION TO GROWTH TEMPERATURE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER - AN ISOFEMALE LINES ANALYSIS [J].
DAVID, JR ;
MORETEAU, B ;
GAUTHIER, JP ;
PETAVY, G ;
STOCKEL, A ;
IMASHEVA, AG .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1994, 26 (03) :229-251
[23]   Genetic variance in temperature dependent adult size deriving from physiological genetic variation at temperature boundaries [J].
de Jong, G ;
Imasheva, A .
GENETICA, 2000, 110 (02) :195-207
[24]   Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability [J].
Debat, V ;
David, P .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (10) :555-561
[25]   QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF REACTION NORMS [J].
DEJONG, G .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1990, 3 (5-6) :447-468
[26]   Environmental effects on body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster and its cellular basis [J].
DeMoed, GH ;
DeJong, G ;
Scharloo, W .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 1997, 70 (01) :35-43
[27]  
Donohue K, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P1969, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01241.x
[28]  
Efron B, 1986, STAT SCI, V1, P54, DOI [DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013815, 10.1214/ss/1177013815]
[29]  
Falconer D.S., 1996, Quantitative Genetics, V4th
[30]  
Flury B., 1988, Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models