Differences in the intensity of light-induced fluorescence emitted by resin composites

被引:25
作者
Kim, Bo-Ra [1 ]
Kang, Si-Mook [1 ]
Kim, Gyung-Min [1 ]
Kim, Baek-Il [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prevent Dent & Publ Oral Hlth, Oral Sci Res Inst,PLUS Project BK21, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Detection; Fluorescence; Resin composites; Quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; DENTAL COMPOSITES; RADIOPACITY; EMISSION; TISSUES; FILLER; TEETH; TOOTH; QLF;
D O I
10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.01.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The aims of this study were to compare the intensities of fluorescence emitted by different resin composites as detected using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) technology, and to compare the fluorescence intensity contrast with the color contrast between a restored composite and the adjacent region of the tooth. Methods: Six brands of light-cured resin composites (shade A2) were investigated. The composites were used to prepare composite discs, and fill holes that had been prepared in extracted human teeth. White light and fluorescence images of all specimens were obtained using a fluorescence camera based on QLF technology (QLF-D) and converted into 8-bit grayscale images. The fluorescence intensity of the discs as well as the fluorescence intensity contrast and the color contrast between the composite restoration and adjacent tooth region were calculated as grayscale levels. Results: The grayscale levels for the composite discs differed significantly with the brand (p < 0.001): Den-Fil (10.84 +/- 0.35, mean +/- SD), Filtek Z350 (58.28 +/- 1.37), Premisa (156.94 +/- 1.58), Grandio (177.20 +/- 0.81), Charisma (207.05 +/- 0.77), and Gradia direct posterior (211.52 +/- 1.66). The difference in grayscale levels between a resin restoration and the adjacent tooth was significantly greater in fluorescence images for each brand than in white-light images, except for the Filtek Z350 (p < 0.05). However, the Filtek Z350 restoration was distinguishable from the adjacent tooth in a fluorescence image. Conclusions: The intensities of fluorescence detected from the resin composites varied. The differences between the composite and adjacent tooth were greater for the fluorescence intensity contrast than for the colors observed in the white-light images. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 119
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Laser-induced flourescence to discriminate between a dental composite resin and tooth
    Ruettermann, St.
    Ritter, J.
    Raab, W. H. -M.
    Bayer, R.
    Janda, R.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2007, 23 (11) : 1390 - 1396
  • [22] Stookey George K, 2005, Dent Clin North Am, V49, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2005.05.009
  • [23] Fluorescence intensity of resin composites and dental tissues before and after accelerated aging: A comparative study
    Takahashi, M. K.
    Vieira, S.
    Rached, R. N.
    Almeida, J. B.
    Aguiar, M.
    Souza, E. M.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2008, 33 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [24] Discrimination between composite resin and teeth using fluorescence properties
    Tani, K
    Watari, F
    Uo, M
    Morita, M
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (04) : 569 - 580
  • [25] Rare earth oxide-containing fluorescent glass filler for composite resin
    Uo, M
    Okamoto, M
    Watari, F
    Tani, K
    Morita, M
    Shintani, A
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2005, 24 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [26] Wilson MA, 2002, OPER DENT, V27, P423