Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection:: A prospective, randomized study

被引:36
作者
León, C
Alvarez-Lerma, F
Ruiz-Santana, S
González, V
de la Torre, MV
Sierra, R
León, M
Rodrigo, JJ
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Valme, Intens Care & Emergency Serv, Intens Care Unit, E-41014 Seville, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Hosp Mar, Intens Care Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Dr Negrin, Intens Care Unit, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[4] Hosp Miguel Servet, Intens Care Unit, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Clin, Intens Care Unit, Malaga, Spain
[6] Hosp Puerta Mar, Intens Care Unit, Cadiz, Spain
[7] Hosp Arnau Vilanova, Intens Care Unit, Lleida, Spain
关键词
catheter-related bloodstream infection; catheter hub; cross-infection; prevention; intensive care unit; critical care; catheterization; intravenous;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000026327.58305.22
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: The hub connecting the catheter and the infusion equipment is a common portal of entry for bacteria causing catheterrelated sepsis. We assessed the efficacy of a new hub model (SegurLock) that incorporates an antiseptic chamber filled with 3% iodinated alcohol in preventing endoluminal catheter contamination and catheter-related bloodstream infection arising at the hub. Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Setting: Seven medical and surgical adult intensive care units in Spain. Patients: A total of 230 patients aged 18 yrs or older requiring the insertion of a nontunneled central venous catheter for >6 days from January 1, 1998, to April 30, 1999. Interventions: Patients were randomized at the time of catheter insertion to receive catheters with standard Luer-lock connector (control group, n = 114) or catheters with the new hub model (n = 116). Measurements and Main Results: Skin, catheter tip, and hub cultures were performed at the time the catheter was withdrawn because therapy was terminated or due to suspicion of sepsis, in which case peripheral blood and infusate cultures were simultaneously taken. Catheter-related bloodstream infection was diagnosed in 19 (8.3%) patients. Catheters were more often withdrawn because of suspicion of infection in the control group (43.8%) than in the new hub model group (30.11%, p <.035). The prevalence of culture-positive catheter hubs without associated bacteremia (colonization) was higher in the control group (14.4% vs. 4.3%, p <.001). Catheter-related bloodstream infection from the catheter hub also occurred more frequently in controls than in patients assigned to the new hub model (7% vs. 1.7%; p <.049; relative risk, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-19). Conclusions: This new antiseptic chamber-containing hub has proved to be effective in preventing endoluminal bacterial colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection from hub contamination in intensive care unit patients with central venous catheters inserted for greater than or equal to6 days. (Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1318-1324).
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1324
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, BMDP STATISTICAL SOFTWARE MANUAL: TO ACCOMPANY BMDP RELEASE 7
[2]   CONSEQUENCES OF INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER SEPSIS [J].
ARNOW, PM ;
QUIMOSING, EM ;
BEACH, M .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 16 (06) :778-784
[3]   Earlier positivity of central-venous- versus peripheral-blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis [J].
Blot, F ;
Schmidt, E ;
Nitenberg, G ;
Tancrède, C ;
Leclercq, B ;
Laplanche, A ;
Andremont, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :105-109
[4]   Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures [J].
Blot, F ;
Nitenberg, G ;
Chachaty, E ;
Raynard, B ;
Germann, N ;
Antoun, S ;
Laplanche, A ;
Brun-Buisson, C ;
Tancrede, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9184) :1071-1077
[5]  
CIL CL, 1997, REV CLIN ESP, V197, pS19
[6]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT OF CENTRAL VENOUS AND PULMONARY-ARTERY CATHETERS [J].
COBB, DK ;
HIGH, KP ;
SAWYER, RG ;
SABLE, CA ;
ADAMS, RB ;
LINDLEY, DA ;
PRUETT, TL ;
SCHWENZER, KJ ;
FARR, BM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (15) :1062-1068
[7]  
de la Tassa JM, 1998, REV CLIN ESP, V198, P641
[8]  
DECICCO M, 1989, LANCET, V2, P1258, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)91861-8
[9]   COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF ALTERNATIVE HAND-WASHING AGENTS IN REDUCING NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS [J].
DOEBBELING, BN ;
STANLEY, GL ;
SHEETZ, CT ;
PFALLER, MA ;
HOUSTON, AK ;
ANNIS, L ;
LI, N ;
WENZEL, RP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (02) :88-93
[10]   CATHETER-RELATED SEPSIS - PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 3 METHODS OF LONG-TERM CATHETER MAINTENANCE [J].
EYER, S ;
BRUMMITT, C ;
CROSSLEY, K ;
SIEGEL, R ;
CERRA, F .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (10) :1073-1079