Breast cancer risk feedback to women in the UK NHS breast screening population

被引:79
|
作者
Evans, D. Gareth R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Donnelly, Louise S. [1 ,2 ]
Harkness, Elaine F. [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Astley, Susan M. [6 ,7 ]
Stavrinos, Paula [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Dawe, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Watterson, Donna [1 ,2 ]
Fox, Lynne [1 ,2 ]
Sergeant, Jamie C. [8 ,9 ]
Ingham, Sarah [10 ]
Harvie, Michelle N. [1 ,2 ]
Wilson, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Beetles, Ursula [1 ,2 ]
Buchan, Iain [10 ]
Brentnall, Adam R. [11 ]
French, David P. [12 ]
Cuzick, Jack [11 ]
Howell, Anthony [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Genesis Breast Canc Prevent Ctr, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ S Manchester Hosp, Nightingale Breast Screening Ctr, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad, Genom Med, Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[4] Cent Manchester Fdn Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[5] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Imaging Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Univ S Manchester Hosp, Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester Acad, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[8] Univ Manchester, Hlth Sci Ctr, Arthritis Res UK Ctr Epidemiol,Manchester Acad, Inst Inflammat & Repair,Fac Med & Human Sci,Ctr M, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[9] Cent Manchester Univ, Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Unit, Manchester Acad,Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[10] Univ Manchester, Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Hlth Informat, Vaughan House,Portsmouth St, Manchester M13 9GB, Lancs, England
[11] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Ctr Canc Prevent, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[12] Univ Manchester, Sch Psychol Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; risk feedback; risk perception; FAMILY-HISTORY; PREDICTION MODEL; INTERVAL CANCERS; DENSITY; PROGRAM; PERCEPTION; MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT; WORRY;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2016.56
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: There are widespread moves to develop risk-stratified approaches to population-based breast screening. The public needs to favour receiving breast cancer risk information, which ideally should produce no detrimental effects. This study investigates risk perception, the proportion wishing to know their 10-year risk and whether subsequent screening attendance is affected. Methods: Fifty thousand women attending the NHS Breast Screening Programme completed a risk assessment questionnaire. Ten-year breast cancer risks were estimated using a validated algorithm (Tyrer-Cuzick) adjusted for visually assessed mammographic density. Women at high risk (>= 8%) and low risk (<1%) were invited for face-to-face or telephone risk feedback and counselling. Results: Of those invited to receive risk feedback, more high-risk women, 500 out of 673 (74.3%), opted to receive a consultation than low-risk women, 106 out of 193 (54.9%) (P<0.001). Women at high risk were significantly more likely to perceive their risk as high (P<0.001) and to attend their subsequent mammogram (94.4%) compared with low-risk women (84.2%; P = 0.04) and all attendees (84.3%; <= 0.0001). Conclusions: Population-based assessment of breast cancer risk is feasible. The majority of women wished to receive risk information. Perception of general population breast cancer risk is poor. There were no apparent adverse effects on screening attendance for high-risk women whose subsequent screening attendance was increased.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1052
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Towards personalized screening: Cumulative risk of breast cancer screening outcomes in women with and without a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer
    Ripping, Theodora Maria
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Otten, Johannes D. M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    Verbeek, Andre L. M.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 138 (07) : 1619 - 1625
  • [22] Screening in Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer
    Schmutzler, Rita Katharina
    Engel, Christoph
    Schreer, Ingrid
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (30) : E607 - E608
  • [23] Assessing the Breast Cancer Risk Distribution for Women Undergoing Screening in British Columbia
    Weisstock, Christina R.
    Rajapakshe, Rasika
    Bitgood, Christabelle
    McAvoy, Steven
    Gordon, Paula B.
    Coldman, Andrew J.
    Parker, Brent A.
    Wilson, Christine
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2013, 6 (10) : 1084 - 1092
  • [24] Performance of risk prediction models in breast cancer screening among women in Cyprus
    Danladi, Ceasar
    Serakinci, Nedime
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2022, 28 (12) : 888 - 895
  • [25] Breast Cancer Screening in High-risk Women During Pregnancy and Lactation
    Portnow, Leah H.
    Snider, Lauren C.
    Bolivar, Kimberly E.
    Bychkovsky, Brittany L.
    Klehm, Margaret R.
    Yeh, Eren D.
    Gombos, Eva C.
    Chikarmane, Sona A.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (05) : 508 - 519
  • [26] Breast cancer screening in average and high-risk women
    Rahman, W. Tania
    Helvie, Mark A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 83 : 3 - 14
  • [27] Risk-based breast cancer screening strategies in women
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Evans, D. Gareth
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 65 : 3 - 17
  • [28] Screening Modalities for Women at Intermediate and High Risk for Breast Cancer
    David A. Spak
    Huong T. Le-Petross
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2019, 11 : 111 - 116
  • [29] Breast cancer screening in women at high risk using MRI
    Leach, Martin O.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 22 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [30] The psychological impact and experience of breast cancer screening in young women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to neurofibromatosis type 1
    Crook, Ashley
    Kwa, Rebekah
    Ephraums, Sarah
    Wilding, Mathilda
    Thiyagarajan, Lavvina
    Fleming, Jane
    Moore, Katrina
    Berman, Yemima
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2022, 21 (02) : 241 - 253