Response of dry bean to Group 15 herbicides applied preplant incorporated

被引:8
作者
Soltani, Nader [1 ]
Shropshire, Christy [1 ]
Sildema, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
关键词
dry bean; pethoxamid; pyroxasulfone; S-metolachlor; Phaseolus vulgaris; Vigna angularis; PREEMERGENCE HERBICIDES; PYROXASULFONE; SENSITIVITY; TOLERANCE; CANADA; PINTO;
D O I
10.1139/cjps-2018-0020
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A study consisting of four field experiments was conducted over a 2-yr period (2016, 2017) near Exeter and Ridgetown, ON, to compare the tolerance of adzuki, kidney, small red, and white beans to four Group 15 herbicides including pethoxamid (1200 and 2400 g a.i. ha(-1)), S-metolachlor (1600 and 3200 g a.i. ha(-1)), dimethenamid-P (693 and 1386 g a.i. ha(-1)), and pyroxasulfone (100 and 200 g a.i. ha(-1)) applied preplant incorporated (PPI). At 1 wk after emergence (WAE), pethoxamid, S-metolachlor, dimethenamid-P, and pyroxasulfone caused as much as 22%, 17%, 38%, and 15% adzuki bean injury, respectively. The injury decreased with time; at 8 WAE, pethoxamid, S-metolachlor, dimethenamid-P, and pyroxasulfone applied PPI caused as much as 3%, 4%, 12%, and 7% adzuki bean injury, respectively. The injury was lower in other market classes of dry bean. At 1, 2, and 4 WAE, pethoxamid, S-metolachlor, dimethenamid-P, and pyroxasulfone caused as much as 4%, 2%, 4%, and 14% injury in kidney bean, 3%, 2%, 4%, and 12% injury in small red bean, and 5%, 3%, 6%, and 13% injury in white bean, respectively. However, the injury at 8 WAE was 5% or less in kidney, small red, and white beans with all Group 15 herbicides evaluated. Based on this research, pyroxasulfone was the most injurious to dry beans, it reduced plant height as much as 15% and seed yield as much as 17%. The Group 15 herbicides evaluated were more injurious to adzuki bean than kidney, small red, or white beans.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1175
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   PINTO BEAN (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS) VARIETAL TOLERANCE TO IMAZETHAPYR [J].
BAUER, TA ;
RENNER, KA ;
PENNER, D ;
KELLY, JD .
WEED SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (03) :417-424
[2]  
Böger P, 2000, PEST MANAG SCI, V56, P497
[3]  
Doersch R., 1974, Proceedings of the North Central Weed Control Conference., P78
[4]  
Gbur EE, 2012, ACSESS PUBL, P1, DOI 10.2134/2012.generalized-linear-mixed-models
[5]  
Hensall District Co-operative, 2017, FOOD PROD
[6]   Managing weeds with herbicides in white bean in Canada: a review [J].
Li, Z. ;
Van Acker, R. ;
Robinson, D. ;
Soltani, N. ;
Sikkema, P. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 97 (05) :755-766
[7]   Analysis of Combined Experiments Revisited [J].
Moore, Kenneth J. ;
Dixon, Philip M. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (02) :763-771
[8]   Dry Edible Bean Mass and Cultivar Response to Dimethenamid and Metolachlor [J].
Poling, Kyle W. ;
Renner, Karen A. ;
Penner, Donald .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) :73-80
[9]  
Powell G.E., 2004, N CENTRAL WEED SCI P, V59, P32
[10]   A CAUTIONARY NOTE ON DATA TRANSFORMATION - BIAS IN BACK-TRANSFORMED MEANS [J].
ROTHERY, P .
BIRD STUDY, 1988, 35 :219-221