Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review of Research for Temporal Variations in Life Cycle Assessment Studies

被引:12
作者
Su, Shu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaodong [3 ]
Zhu, Chen [3 ]
Lu, Yujie [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lee, Hyun Woo [7 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Bldg Equipment Energy & Environm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Dept Bldg Engn, Coll Civil Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Tongji Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Performance Evolut & Control Engn Struct, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Inst Intelligent Sci & Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Construct Management, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental impact; dynamic characterization; dynamic inventory analysis; dynamic weighting; life cycle assessment; temporal variation; DEPENDENT CLIMATE IMPACT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSION; BIOGENIC CARBON; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; FRESH-WATER; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; WHEAT PRODUCTION; EMBODIED ENERGY; TIME;
D O I
10.1089/ees.2021.0052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive and important environmental management tool around the world. However, lacking temporal information has been a major challenge. In the past decade, dynamic LCA (DLCA), which incorporates temporal variations into assessment, has been an emerging research topic with increasing publications. A timely comprehensive review is needed to present current progress and discuss future directions. This article reviews 144 DLCA articles quantitatively and qualitatively. A bibliometric approach is adopted to conduct co-occurrence analysis and cluster analysis of DLCA studies. The research progress, approaches, and limitations of three temporal variation types (i.e., dynamic life cycle inventory, dynamic characterization factors, and dynamic weighting factors) in DLCA studies are systematically analyzed and discussed. It is concluded that: (1) dynamic inventory analysis is usually conducted by collecting time-differentiated data at each time step. Field monitoring, simulation, scenario analysis, and prediction based on historical data are common approaches. (2) Dynamic characterization studies primarily focus on two impact categories: global warming and toxicity. More studies are in need. (3) Various methods and indicators (i.e., dynamic pollution damage cost, temporal environmental policy targets, and discount rates) are used to solve the dynamic weighting issue, and they have specific limitations. Finally, three interesting topics are discussed: comparison between dynamic and static results, the large data amount issue, and the trend of tools development. This review offers a holistic view on temporal variations in DLCA studies and provides reference and directions for future dynamic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1026
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Greenhouse gas emission timing in life cycle assessment and the global warming potential of perennial energy crops [J].
Almeida, Joana ;
Degerickx, Jeroen ;
Achten, Wouter M. J. ;
Muys, Bart .
CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2015, 6 (5-6) :185-195
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework
[3]   Integrated earth system dynamic modeling for life cycle impact assessment of ecosystem services [J].
Arbault, Damien ;
Riviere, Mylene ;
Rugani, Benedetto ;
Benetto, Enrico ;
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 472 :262-272
[4]   Removing Shadows from Consequential LCA through a Time-Dependent Modeling Approach: Policy-Making in the Road Pavement Sector [J].
AzariJafari, Hessam ;
Yahia, Ammar ;
Amor, Ben .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (03) :1087-1097
[5]   Preparing the ground for an operational handling of long-term emissions in LCA [J].
Bakas, Ioannis ;
Hauschild, Michael Z. ;
Astrup, Thomas F. ;
Rosenbaum, Ralph K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (10) :1444-1455
[6]   Implementing a Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment Methodology with a Case Study on Domestic Hot Water Production [J].
Beloin-Saint-Pierre, Didier ;
Levasseur, Annie ;
Margni, Manuele ;
Blanc, Isabelle .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2017, 21 (05) :1128-1138
[7]   The ESPA (Enhanced Structural Path Analysis) method: a solution to an implementation challenge for dynamic life cycle assessment studies [J].
Beloin-Saint-Pierre, Didier ;
Heijungs, Reinout ;
Blanc, Isabelle .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (04) :861-871
[9]   Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches [J].
Breton, Charles ;
Blanchet, Pierre ;
Amor, Ben ;
Beauregard, Robert ;
Chang, Wen-Shao .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06)
[10]   Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Cardellini, Giuseppe ;
Mutel, Christopher L. ;
Vial, Estelle ;
Muys, Bart .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 645 :585-595