Modelling multiple sources of dissemination bias in meta-analysis

被引:14
作者
Bowden, Jack [1 ]
Jackson, Dan [1 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Biostat Unit, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
meta-analysis; dissemination bias; dissemination route; Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; PUBLICATION BIAS; CONSORT STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/sim.3813
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Asymmetry in the funnel plot for a meta-analysis suggests the presence of dissemination bias. This may be caused by publication bias through the decisions of journal editors, by selective reporting of research results by authors or by a combination of both. Typically, study results that are statistically significant or have larger estimated effect sizes are more likely to appear in the published literature, hence giving a biased picture of the evidence-base. Previous statistical approaches for addressing dissemination bias have assumed only a single selection mechanism. Here we consider a more realistic scenario in which multiple dissemination processes, involving both the publishing authors and journals, are operating. In practical applications, the methods can be used to provide sensitivity analyses for the potential effects of multiple dissemination biases operating in meta-analysis. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 955
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [2] AZZALINI A, 1985, SCAND J STAT, V12, P171
  • [3] Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies
    Baker, Rose
    Jackson, Dan
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (03) : 785 - 792
  • [4] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olkin, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, KF
    Simel, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08): : 637 - 639
  • [5] OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS
    BEGG, CB
    MAZUMDAR, M
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 1088 - 1101
  • [6] Campbell H., 2002, Pharmacogenomics Journal, V2, P349
  • [7] CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
    Campbell, MK
    Elbourne, DR
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 702 - 708
  • [8] A bound for publication bias based on the fraction of unpublished studies
    Copas, J
    Jackson, D
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (01) : 146 - 153
  • [9] What works?: selectivity models and meta-analysis
    Copas, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1999, 162 : 95 - 109
  • [10] Inference for non-random samples
    Chesher, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1997, 59 (01): : 77 - 95