Ecological footprint analysis of environmental impacts by cascaded exploitation of diversion-type small hydropower: a case study in southwest china

被引:5
作者
Wang, Zhenhua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Qingyun [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zhuo [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Xianqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Weihua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, Basin Water Environm Res Dept, Wuhan 430010, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Changjiang River Sci Res Inst, Key Lab Basin Water Resource & Ecoenvironm Sci Hu, Wuhan 430010, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Geohazards & Ecoenvironm T, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
来源
2017 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RESOURCE EXPLORATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (REES 2017) | 2017年 / 64卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/64/1/012056
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cascaded exploitation of diversion-type small hydropower (SHP) offers a source of new energy as well as socioeconomic benefits; however, it inevitably causes environmental disturbance and damage. Previous studies on the cumulative effect of cascaded diversion SHP rarely discussed using quantitative analysis method. In this paper, the ecological footprint analysis approach is proposed to assess the positive and negative impacts of cascaded diversion SHP on environment of a small- scale river in Southwest China. Positive impact is defined as ecological supply footprint (ESF), which refers to vegetation protection by replacing firewood with SHP. Negative impact is defined as ecological loss footprint (ELF), which includes fish and net primary productivity loss, vegetation destruction and soil erosion. With the raising in the number (n>4) of diversion SHP stations, the difference between ELF and ESF increases remarkably, suggesting that the adverse impacts of cascaded diversion SHP accumulate in the study area. Compared with vegetation destruction and soil erosion, the cumulative loss of fish and net productivity is the most important aspect of the adverse impacts which needs more attentions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A new generation of small hydro and pumped-hydro power plants: Advances and future challenges [J].
Ardizzon, G. ;
Cavazzini, G. ;
Pavesi, G. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 :746-761
[2]  
Cui G. X, 2006, CHINA WATER RESOURCE, V20, P23
[3]   Renewable energy and hydropower utilization tendency worldwide [J].
Darmawi ;
Sipahutar, Riman ;
Bernas, Siti Masreah ;
Imanuddin, Momon Sodik .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 17 :213-215
[4]   Benefit Evaluation on Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of National Small Hydropower Ecological Protection Project [J].
Ding Yi-fan ;
Tang De-shan ;
Wang Ting .
2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 :540-544
[5]  
Huang Z, 2011, SMALL HYDROPOWER, V6, P47
[6]   An evaluation of ecological losses from hydropower development in Tibet [J].
Li, X. J. ;
Zhang, J. ;
Xu, L. Y. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 76 :178-185
[7]  
Liang Fu-qing, 2010, SMALL HYDROPOWER, V2, P47
[8]  
Liu B X, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V42, P43
[9]  
Liu Y., 2014, YANGTZE RIVER, V45, P10
[10]  
Ministry of Water Resources in, 2016, 10 MAJ EV RUR HYDR, P60