Comparing the development and deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies in Norway, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada and the United States- An innovation system perspective

被引:24
作者
van Alphen, Klaas [1 ]
Hekkert, Marko P. [1 ]
Turkenburg, Wim C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev & Innovat, Dept Innovat Studies, POB 80115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Dept Sci Technol & Soc, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9 | 2009年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Functions of Innovation Systems; CCS RD&D; Innovation Policy; Energy Transition;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.279
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In order to take up the twin challenge of reducing CO2-emissions, while meeting a growing energy demand, the potential deployment of CCS is attracting a growing interest of policy makers around the world. In this study we evaluate and compare national approaches towards the development of CCS in the U. S. A, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway and Australia. The analysis is done by using the functions of innovation systems approach. This approach implicates that new technology is developed, demonstrated and deployed in the context of a technological innovation system. By the assessment made in this study the strengths and weaknesses of the innovation systems are identified, which is vital for the development of a coherent (long-term) policy strategy that enhance the successful implementation of CCS. The performance assessment and comparison of the CCS innovation systems shows that the extensive knowledge base and knowledge networks, which have been accumulated over the past years, has not yet been valorized by entrepreneurs to explore the market for integrated CCS concepts linked to power generation. This indicates that the build-up of the innovation system has entered a critical phase that is decisive for a further thriving development of CCS in Norway, the Netherlands, Canada, Australia and the USA. In order to move the CCS innovation systems through this present difficult episode and deploy more advanced CCS concepts at a larger scale; it is necessary to direct policy initiatives at the identified weak system functions, i.e. entrepreneurial activity, market formation and the mobilization of resources. Moreover, in some specific countries governmental guidance and the creation of legitimacy also needs more attention. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:4591 / 4599
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*ACCSEPT, 2007, ACC CO2 CAPT STOR EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], CO2 CAPT STOR KEY AB
[3]  
*AUSTR GOV, 2004, SEC AUSTR EN FUT
[4]  
BACHU S, 2002, INT J GREENH GAS CON, V2, P259
[5]   Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Carlsson, Bo ;
Lindmark, Sven ;
Rickne, Annika .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) :407-429
[6]  
Carlsson B., 1991, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, V2, P93, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01224915
[7]  
Edquist C., 2004, SCI PUBL POLICY, V31, P485, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154304781779741
[8]  
Environment Canada, 2008, TURN CORN REG FRAM I
[9]   UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures [J].
Foxon, TJ ;
Gross, R ;
Chase, A ;
Howes, J ;
Arnall, A ;
Anderson, D .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (16) :2123-2137
[10]   Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study [J].
Geels, FW .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (8-9) :1257-1274