A survey about the usefulness of computerized systems to support illness management in clinical practice

被引:8
作者
Ruland, CM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Natl Hosp, Rikshosp, Ctr Shared Decis Making & Nursing Res, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
关键词
decision support systems; illness management; patient preferences;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.004
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose: This survey among an interdisciplinary group of clinicians was conducted to obtain their opinions about the usefulness of decision support systems (DSS) for evidence- and patient preference-based illness management, factors important to their implementation, and criteria for evaluating their effectiveness. Methods: A questionnaire was sent by mail or electronically to a convenience sample of 184 nurses, physicians and other health care professionals. Results: The DSS ability to provide information about potential benefits and harms of intervention options and reports on patient outcomes of symptom relief, functional status and preference achievement was considered most useful among DSS features. Nurses rated the usefulness of the DSS higher than physicians did. Ease of use, no increase in workload, and timely, precise information were rated as the most important factors for successful implementation. The most frequently selected patient, care process/provider and system outcomes rated as indicators for DSS effectiveness were: patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, symptom relief, functional status, and alignment of patient preferences with realistic expectations; congruence between patient preferences and patient care; clinician time use; quality of patient documentation and cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: This survey provided crucial information to successfully develop DSS for evidence- and patient preference- based illness management that are perceived helpful by their potential users. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 805
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] PATIENT VIEWS ON QUALITY CARE IN GENERAL-PRACTICE - LITERATURE-REVIEW
    LEWIS, JR
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1994, 39 (05) : 655 - 670
  • [12] LLEWELLYNTHOMAS HA, CHOLESTEROL LOWERING
  • [13] Feasibility and effects of decision aids
    Molenaar, S
    Sprangers, MAG
    Postma-Schuit, FCE
    Rutgers, EJT
    Noorlander, J
    Hendriks, J
    De Haes, HCJM
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (01) : 112 - 127
  • [14] O'Connor A M, 1999, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P67
  • [15] Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for postmenopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy
    O'Connor, AM
    Tugwell, P
    Wells, GA
    Elmslie, T
    Jolly, E
    Hollingworth, G
    Mcpherson, R
    Drake, E
    Hopman, W
    Mackenzie, T
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (03) : 295 - 303
  • [16] Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review
    O'Connor, AM
    Rostom, A
    Fiset, V
    Tetroe, J
    Entwhistle, V
    Llewellyn-Thomas, H
    Holmes-Rovner, M
    Barry, M
    Jones, J
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) : 731 - 734
  • [17] Physicians' opinions about decision aids for patients considering systemic adjuvant therapy for axillary-node negative breast cancer
    OConnor, AM
    LlewellynThomas, HA
    Sawka, C
    Pinfold, SP
    To, T
    Harrison, DE
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1997, 30 (02) : 143 - 153
  • [18] PATEL V, 1997, HDB MED INFORMATICS, P473
  • [19] Handheld technology to improve patient care: Evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside
    Ruland, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2002, 9 (02) : 192 - 201
  • [20] Decision support for patient preference-based care planning: Effects on nursing care and patient outcomes
    Ruland, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, 6 (04) : 304 - 312