How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison

被引:208
作者
Funke, Simon Arpad [1 ]
Sprei, Frances [2 ]
Gnann, Till [1 ]
Ploetz, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res ISI, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Energy & Environm, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Electric vehicles; Fast charging; Public charging; International comparison; ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; MARKET DIFFUSION; EARLY ADOPTERS; RESPONSES; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plug-In electric vehicles (PEV) are in an early market phase in almost all markets. Still, the lack of public charging infrastructure is a barrier to PEV adoption. The assessment of future charging infrastructure needs is often based on key figures, mainly the ratio of PEV to public charging points. However, countries differ regarding their framework conditions, e.g. the availability of home charging, and the question of how much public charging infrastructure is needed cannot be answered equally for all countries. Yet, studies analyzing the framework conditions for the medium- to long-term demand for charging infrastructure are rare. Here, we review the existing literature and summarize the evidence for the importance of framework conditions on charging infrastructure needs. Furthermore, we illustrate the literature evidence by comparing the framework conditions for charging infrastructure in different countries based on a comprehensive dataset of framework parameters. We find public charging infrastructure as alternative to home charging is only needed in some densely populated areas. However, framework conditions vary largely among countries. Accordingly, findings from literature for specific countries can only be transferred to other countries to a limited extent.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 242
页数:19
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Dissemination of electric vehicles in urban areas: Major factors for success
    Ajanovic, Amela
    Haas, Reinhard
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 115 : 1451 - 1458
  • [2] Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC), 2017, MAPS DAT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, 16822019 TOI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, 14922016 TOI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, ROAD LENGTHS MIL ROA
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, TRANSITIONING LONGER
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, THESIS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, 2018 VS 2019 CAL MON
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, 2017 REV WORLD POP P
  • [10] Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric-What do car buyers want?
    Axsen, Jonn
    Kurani, Kenneth S.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 61 : 532 - 543