Family caregiver communication in oncology: advancing a typology

被引:26
作者
Goldsmith, Joy [1 ]
Wittenberg, Elaine [2 ]
Platt, Christine Small [1 ]
Iannarino, Nicholas T. [3 ]
Reno, Jenna [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept Commun, 235 Art & Commun Bldg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Nursing Res & Educ, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Language Culture & Commun, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Dept Commun Studies, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
CANCER COMMUNICATION; DECISION-MAKING; PERCEPTIONS; PATTERNS; BURDEN; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/pon.3862
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe quality of communication between the patient and family caregiver impacts quality of life and well-being for the two; however, providers have few tools to understand communication patterns and assess the communication needs and preferences of caregivers. The aims of this study were to examine family communication patterns among oncology patients and their caregivers and to identify common characteristics among four different types of family caregivers. MethodsNurses recruited oncology patient-caregiver dyads through a large cancer treatment center in the Southeast. Patients and caregivers were separated from one another and interviewed during chemotherapeutic infusions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematized. ResultsA sample of 24 patients and their caregivers (n=48) were interviewed. The majority of dyads (21, 88%) shared the same family communication pattern. Common caregiver communication features support previous work identifying four caregiver communication types: Manager, Carrier, Partner, and Lone caregivers. Manager caregivers lead patients by utilizing extensive medical knowledge, whereas Carrier caregivers were led by patients and described tireless acts to maintain the family and avoid difficult conversations. Partner caregivers facilitated family involvement and open communication on a variety of topics, while Lone caregivers focused solely on biomedical matters and a hope for cure. ConclusionsCaregiver communication types were corroborated by patient-caregiver descriptions of caregiving. However, more information is needed to ascertain the variables associated with each caregiver type. Future work to improve identification of caregiver types and create targeted caregiver care plans will require further study of health literacy levels and tested communication interventions per type. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 470
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, QUALITATIVE COMMUNIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing between five methods
[3]  
Beavers H, 2000, J FAMILY THEORY, P128
[4]   Being Open without Talking about It: A Rhetorical/Normative Approach to Understanding Topic Avoidance in Families after a Lung Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Caughlin, John P. ;
Mikucki-Enyart, Sylvia L. ;
Middleton, Ashley V. ;
Stone, Anne M. ;
Brown, Laura E. .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2011, 78 (04) :409-436
[5]  
Cole RE, 2013, How do families cope with chronic illness?
[6]   Adapters, Strugglers, and Case Managers: A Typology of Spouse Caregivers [J].
Davis, Linda Lindsey ;
Chestnutt, Deborah ;
Molloy, Margory ;
Deshefy-Longhi, Tess ;
Shim, Bomin ;
Gilliss, Catherine L. .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2014, 24 (11) :1492-1500
[7]  
EMANUEL EJ, 1992, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V267, P2067
[8]  
Fitzpatrick M.A., 2004, J FAM COMMUN, V4, P167, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327698JFC0403&4_4, DOI 10.1080/15267431.2004.9670129]
[9]   COMMUNICATION SCHEMATA WITHIN THE FAMILY - MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES ON FAMILY-INTERACTION [J].
FITZPATRICK, MA ;
RITCHIE, LD .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1994, 20 (03) :275-301
[10]   Family Caregiver Role and Burden Related to Gender and Family Relationships [J].
Friedemann, Marie-Luise ;
Buckwalter, Kathleen C. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING, 2014, 20 (03) :313-336