Evaluation of Drug Trials in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries and Local Commercial Availability of Newly Approved Drugs

被引:38
作者
Miller, Jennifer E. [1 ,2 ]
Mello, Michelle M. [3 ,4 ]
Wallach, Joshua D. [5 ]
Gudbranson, Emily M. [1 ]
Bohlig, Blake [6 ]
Ross, Joseph S. [1 ]
Gross, Cary P. [1 ]
Bach, Peter B. [7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Program Biomed Eth & Bioeth Int, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Freeman Spogli Inst Int Studies, Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Hlth Policy, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
CLINICAL-TRIALS; AGE; US; PARTICIPATION; PRICES; WOMEN; OLDER;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7075
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Clinical research supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals is largely conducted outside the US. OBJECTIVE To characterize where drugs were tested for FDA approval and to determine how commonly and quickly these drugs received marketing approval in the countries where they were tested, both overall and by country income level and geographical region. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional analysis of trials supporting FDA approval of novel drugs in 2012 and 2014, sponsored by large drug companies, did not involve human participants. The settings were the countries hosting trials supporting US drug approval. Data sources included Drugs@FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and drug regulatory agency websites. Data analysis was completed March through September 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were the proportion of drugs approved for marketing in the countries where they were tested for FDA approval within 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years of FDA approval and the proportion of countries contributing participants to trials supporting FDA approvals receiving market access to the drugs they helped test within 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years of FDA approval. RESULTS In 2012 and 2014, the FDA approved 34 novel drugs sponsored by large companies, on the basis of a total of 898 trials, 563 of which had location information available. Each drug was tested in a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 25 (18-37) unique countries, including a median (IQR) of 20 (13-25) high-income countries, 6 (4-11) upper-middle-income countries, and 1 (0-2) low-middle-income country. One drug was approved for marketing in all testing countries within 1 year of FDA approval and 15% (5 of 34 drugs) were approved in all testing countries within 5 years of FDA approval. Of the 70 countries contributing research participants for FDA drug approvals, 7% (5 countries) received market access to drugs they helped test within 1 year of FDA approval and 31% (22 countries) did so within 5 years. Access within 1 year occurred in 13% (5 of 39) of high-income countries, 0 of 22 upper-middle-income countries (0%), and 0 of 9 lower-middle-income countries (0%), whereas at 5 years access rates were 46% (18 of 39 countries), 9% (2 of 22 countries), and 22% (2 of 9 countries), respectively. Approvals were faster in high-income countries (median [IQR], 8 [0-11] months) than in upper-middle-income countries (median [IQR], 11 [5-29] months) or lower-middle-income countries (median [IQR], 17 [11-27] months) after FDA approval. Access was lowest in African countries. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that substantial gaps exist between where FDA-approved drugs are tested and where they ultimately become available to patients, raising concerns about the equitable distribution of research benefits at the population level.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Speeding Access to Vaccines and Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Case for Change and a Framework for Optimized Product Market Authorization [J].
Ahonkhai, Vincent ;
Martins, Samuel F. ;
Portet, Alexandre ;
Lumpkin, Murray ;
Hartman, Dan .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11)
[2]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, World Bank Country and Lending Groups
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Priority Review
[5]   The Hidden Cost Of Low Prices: Limited Access To New Drugs In India [J].
Berndt, Ernst R. ;
Cockburn, Iain M. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (09) :1567-1575
[6]   Registration and local production of essential medicines in Uganda [J].
Brhlikova, Petra ;
Maigetter, Karen ;
Murison, Jude ;
Agaba, Amon G. ;
Tusiimire, Jonans ;
Pollock, Allyson M. .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 13 (01)
[7]   Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010-2016 [J].
Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina ;
Beierlein, Jennifer M. ;
Khanuja, Navleen Surjit ;
McNamee, Laura M. ;
Ledley, Fred D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (10) :2329-2334
[8]   Regulatory Review of New Therapeutic Agents - FDA versus EMA, 2011-2015 [J].
Downing, Nicholas S. ;
Zhang, Audrey D. ;
Ross, Joseph S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (14) :1386-1387
[9]   Ethical and Scientific Implications of the Globalization of Clinical Research [J].
Glickman, Seth W. ;
McHutchison, John G. ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Cairns, Charles B. ;
Harrington, Robert A. ;
Califf, Robert M. ;
Schulman, Kevin A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (08) :816-823
[10]   The availability and affordability of orphan drugs for rare diseases in China [J].
Gong, Shiwei ;
Wang, Yingxiao ;
Pan, Xiaoyun ;
Zhang, Liang ;
Huang, Rui ;
Chen, Xin ;
Hu, Juanjuan ;
Xu, Yi ;
Jin, Si .
ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2016, 11