Moment-rotation responses of the human lumbosacral spinal column

被引:91
作者
Guan, Yabo
Yoganandan, Narayan
Moore, Jason
Pintar, Frank A.
Zhang, Jiangyue
Maiman, Dennis J.
Laud, Purushottam
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Neurosurg, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] VA MEd Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Milwaukee, WI USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Biostat, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
lumbosacral column; human spine; pure moment loading; moment-rotation responses;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.027
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the human lumbosacral joint behaves differently from LI-L5 joints and provides primary moment-rotation responses under pure moment flexion and extension and left and right lateral bending oil a level-bylevel basis. In addition, range of motion (ROM) and stiffness data were extracted from the moment-rotation responses. Ten T12-S1 column specimens with ages ranging from 27 to 68 years (mean: 50.6 +/- 13.2) were tested at a load level of 4.0 N m. Nonlinear flexion and extension and left and right lateral bending moment-rotation responses at each spinal level are reported in the form of a logarithmic function. The mean ROM was the greatest at the L5-S1 level under flexion (7.37 +/- 3.69 degrees) and extension (4.62 +/- 2.56 degrees) and at the L3-L4 level under lateral bending (4.04 +/- 1.1 degrees). The mean ROM was the least at the L1-L2 level under flexion (2.42 +/- 0.90 degrees), L2-L3 level under extension (1.58 +/- 0.63 degrees), and L1-L2 level under lateral bending (2.50 +/- 0.75 degrees). The present study proved the hypothesis that L5-S1 motions are significantly greater than L1-L5 motions under flexion and extension loadings, but the hypothesis was found to be untrue under the lateral bending mode. These experimental data are useful in the improved validation of FE models, which will increase the confidence of stress analysis and other modeling applications. (C) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1975 / 1980
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF FACET GEOMETRY ON THE AXIAL TORQUE-ROTATION RESPONSE OF LUMBAR MOTION SEGMENTS [J].
AHMED, AM ;
DUNCAN, NA ;
BURKE, DL .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (05) :391-401
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, TRUNK VERTEBRAL COLU
[3]   A finite element model of the L5-S1 functional spinal unit: Development and comparison with biomechanical tests in vitro [J].
Charriere, E. ;
Sirey, F. ;
Zysset, P.K. .
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2003, 6 (04) :249-261
[4]   Multi-segment FEA of the human lumbar spine including the heterogeneity of the annulus fibrosus [J].
Eberlein, R ;
Holzapfel, GA ;
Fröhlich, M .
COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2004, 34 (02) :147-163
[5]  
*FARFAN, 1973, MECH DIS LOW BACK
[6]   AN ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE MECHANICS OF SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION [J].
GOEL, VK ;
KIM, YE ;
LIM, TH ;
WEINSTEIN, JN .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (09) :1003-1011
[7]   KINEMATICS OF THE WHOLE LUMBAR SPINE - EFFECT OF DISCECTOMY [J].
GOEL, VK ;
GOYAL, S ;
CLARK, C ;
NISHIYAMA, K ;
NYE, T .
SPINE, 1985, 10 (06) :543-554
[8]   Effects of slip severity and loading directions on the stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis: A finite element model study [J].
Natarajan, RN ;
Garretson, RB ;
Biyani, A ;
Lim, TH ;
Andersson, GBJ ;
An, HS .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (11) :1103-1112
[9]   Comparative strengths and structural properties of the upper and lower cervical spine in flexion and extension [J].
Nightingale, RW ;
Winkelstein, BA ;
Knaub, KE ;
Richardson, WJ ;
Luck, JF ;
Myers, BS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 35 (06) :725-732
[10]   HOW DOES POSTURE AFFECT COUPLING IN THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
PANJABI, M ;
YAMAMOTO, I ;
OXLAND, T ;
CRISCO, J .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (09) :1002-1011