Entanglement plays an important role in evolutionary generalized prisoner's dilemma game on small-world networks

被引:0
作者
Yong, Xi [1 ]
Sun, Hong-liang [2 ]
Li, Juan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Software, State Key Lab Comp Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Nottingham, Int Doctoral Innovat Ctr, Ningbo Campus,199 Taikang East Rd, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Beifang Univ Nationalities, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, 204 Wenchang North Rd, Yinchuan 750021, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE ADVANCED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATES, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IMCEC 2016) | 2016年
关键词
Quantum Game; Evolutionary Game; Small World Networks; Complex Networks; QUANTUM STRATEGIES; COOPERATION; EMERGENCE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Cooperation is a fundamental aspect of biological systems and human society. In this work, we propose a generalized prisoner's dilemma quantum game and study the game on Watts-Strogatz small-world network (WS model) with different values of entanglement. Here entanglement is used as a metaphor to study relationship between players. In a single step, each player has three strategies to choose: cooperation, defection and adopting a special quantum strategy first introduced by Eisert (denoted by Q). The person who chooses the quantum strategy Q can be regarded as a super cooperator. In prisoner's dilemma game, cooperation is very hard to emerge on relatively homogeneous networks, such as random graphs and WS model. Our experimental results show that in generalized prisoners dilemma quantum game, entanglement can guarantee emergence of super cooperators and greatly increase the payoff of the whole network. Even on homogeneous networks with very large inducement value(b is close to 2), the frequency of cooperators can still exceeds 70%. This work provides a new insight into understanding cooperation when considering the role of relationship between cooperators.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 324
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Multiplayer quantum games [J].
Benjamin, SC ;
Hayden, PM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 64 (03) :4
[2]   Quantum Game of Life [J].
Bleh, D. ;
Calarco, T. ;
Montangero, S. .
EPL, 2012, 97 (02)
[4]   Analyzing Three-Player Quantum Games in an EPR Type Setup [J].
Chappell, James M. ;
Iqbal, Azhar ;
Abbott, Derek .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (07)
[5]   Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer [J].
Du, JF ;
Li, H ;
Xu, XD ;
Shi, MJ ;
Wu, JH ;
Zhou, XY ;
Han, RD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2002, 88 (13) :4
[6]   Quantum games and quantum strategies [J].
Eisert, J ;
Wilkens, M ;
Lewenstein, M .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 83 (15) :3077-3080
[7]   Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies [J].
Gomez-Gardenes, J. ;
Campillo, M. ;
Floria, L. M. ;
Moreno, Y. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (10)
[8]   Game theory and physics [J].
Hauert, C ;
Szabó, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2005, 73 (05) :405-414
[9]   Evolutionarily stable strategies in quantum games [J].
Iqbal, A ;
Toor, AH .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2001, 280 (5-6) :249-256
[10]  
Kim B. J., 2002, PHYS REV E, V66