Definition of treatment goals in terms of clinician-reported disease severity and patient-reported outcomes in moderate-to-severe adult atopic dermatitis: a systematic review

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing skin disease. Although a definitive cure is not available, appropriate treatment can control the disease. The advent of biologic drugs has led to the need for a clear definition of the disease severity and treatment response. A standardized list of outcomes that defines clinician-reported disease severity and patients' reported severity are therefore essential. Solid criteria to define the response to treatment and treatment failure are lacking to date. Objective This systematic review defines treatment goals in terms of clinician-reported disease severity and patient-reported outcomes, referring to the published moderate-to-severe AD clinical trials. The application of these goals in daily clinical practice will ensure a better selection of available treatment options, thus increasing patient quality of care. Materials and methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify the treatments goals of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on moderate-to-severe adult AD published between January 2000 and October 2020. Results In total, 14 studies met the eligibility criteria. The most widely used tools in terms of clinician-reported disease severity were the Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) followed by the Eczema Area Severity Score (EASI) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA). For disease severity scales as efficacy outcome in RCTs, the greatest standardization and reproducibility was for improvement of at least 50% in EASI score and IGA score reduction of >= 2 grades from baseline. The most widely used tools from the patients' perspective were the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Numeric Rate Scale (NRS)-itch and Patient Oriented Eczema Measure Score (POEM). In terms of patients' reported efficacy outcomes in RCTs, a numerical DLQI, NRS-itch and POEM score improvement of at least 4 points from baseline was reported. Conclusions This systematic review highlights the need for collaboration between experts in order to define and optimize treatment outcomes. Despite considerable progress in harmonizing outcome measures, promoted by the foundation of the Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative in 2008, our results demonstrate that this endpoint is still an unmet need. Based on the literature data we propose a minimum treatment goal algorithm for use in daily clinical practice aimed at stimulating a discussion on how the care of AD patients could be further improved.